Monday, November 25, 2013
Ebonyi University Breaks Ranks With ASUU, Reopens For Lectures
The management of Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, in eastern Nigeria on Monday ordered all the lecturers and students to return to classes immediately.
In a statement issued in Abakaliki, the Registrar, Mr Sam Egwu, said academic activities would resume on all the campuses of the university on Tuesday 26 November, saying the authorities have the support of 80 per cent of the academic staff.
The academic staff, in compliance with the directive of the national union, the Academic Staff Union of Universities, went on strike from 1 July. ASUU is still seeking an audience with President Goodluck Jonathan to reach a decision on whether to call off the strike.
The ESU statement said: “we have waited patiently for the Federal Government and ASUU to resolve the impasse (strike) to no avail. The management of Ebonyi State University has, therefore, resolved to commence academic activities on Tuesday.
“We, therefore, use this medium to inform all concerned that teaching and learning will begin fully on Tuesday, to enable us to cover what we have lost to the strike” , the statement said.
The decision to reopen the school was reached at a management meeting held on 20 November.
It said “80 per cent of the lecturers in attendance agreed that they should ignore ASUU’s nationwide strike and return to class.
“The lecturers are not happy that the strike is lingering and therefore gave their full support for the resumption of school on Tuesday”, the source said.
The source, however, said that Chairman of ASUU in the university did not attend the meeting.
The chairman, Prof. Ndubuisi Idenyi, in an interview with NAN, dissociated the branch of ASUU from the decision to resume studies.
“The strike is still in progress until we get directives from our national leadership”, he told NAN.
Idenyi said the leadership of ASUU in the university was ready for a showdown with the school’s management if it decided to punish lecturers who defied the return-to-duty order.
SOURCE: P M NEWS
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Rally Marks Anniversary Of Spain Dictator's Death
Mohamed, 33-years old, from Senegal, puts away a picture of former
German leader Adolf Hitler at the stand where he works temporary selling
fascist and nazi merchandise, at the end of the 38th anniversary of
former Spanish Dictator Gen. Francisco Franco's death, in Madrid, Spain,
Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013. Hundreds of people nostalgic for Spain's fascist
past held a rally on Sunday to mark the 38th anniversary of dictator
Francisco Franco's death. The peaceful demonstration was held in
Madrid's central Plaza de Oriente square near the opera and Royal Palace
in the city's old quarter. On Saturday an anti-Franco protest was held
northwest of Madrid at Franco's mausoleum.
Eduardo Arias, president of the right-wing Spanish
Patriotic Knot association, addressed the gathering and exhorted the
government to oppose immigration at a time when the country has sky-high
unemployment. Sympathizers made stiff-arm salutes and waved Spanish
flags before singing anthems dating from Franco's 1939-1975 rule.
Stalls sold far-right, fascist and Nazi memorabilia to curious passers-by on the fringes of Sunday's rally. On Saturday an anti-fascist protest was held outside El Valle de los Caidos, a giant mausoleum north of Madrid where Franco is buried.
Franco won the 1936-1939 civil war with the help of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy.
MADRID, SPAIN (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — Hundreds of people nostalgic for
Spain's fascist past have held a rally outside Madrid's downtown Royal
Palace to commemorate the 38th anniversary of dictator Francisco
Franco's death.
Stalls sold far-right, fascist and Nazi memorabilia to curious passers-by on the fringes of Sunday's rally. On Saturday an anti-fascist protest was held outside El Valle de los Caidos, a giant mausoleum north of Madrid where Franco is buried.
Franco won the 1936-1939 civil war with the help of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy.
Dominicans Expel 244 Haitians Over Border Killings
Marie Matte Mayan 26, sleeps on the floor with her twins, Maudeline and
Maudena Pierre an a shelter after being deported by Dominican Republic
authorities, in Croix-des-Bouquets, Haiti, Sunday Nov. 24, 2013.
Dominican authorities expelled 244 Haitians after an elderly Dominican
couple was slain in an apparent burglary near the border between the two
countries and an angry mob retaliated by killing a Haitian man, Rev.
Antoine Lissaint of Haiti's Jesuit Refugee and Migrant Organization said
Sunday.
The Rev. Antoine Lissaint of Haiti's Jesuit Refugee
and Migrant Organization told The Associated Press that a group of
Dominicans killed the man because they blamed people of Haitian descent
for the fatal stabbing of the couple.
Dominican police issued a statement saying Jose Mendez Diaz and Luja Encarnacion Diaz, both 70, were killed during an apparent home burglary in which the killers got away with two sacks of coffee. Detectives found a knife and stick at the scene.
There was no comment from the Dominican government. A group of Haitians who had been living in the southwestern Dominican town of Neiba the past several years sought refuge at a police station because they feared further reprisals, Lissaint said. Police handed the group over to soldiers who drove them to the border and expelled them to Haiti on Saturday.
Migrant advocates said some of the people sent out of the Dominican Republic were eager to leave because they feared there would be more mob violence. Haiti and the Dominican Republic have a long history of acrimony as neighbors on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. But relations between the two have worsened since a Dominican court decision in September threatened to revoke citizenship for residents of the Dominican Republic of Haitian descent.
Jean-Baptiste Azolin, deputy coordinator for the Support Group for Repatriates and Refugees, said not all the people who were repatriated were picked up at the police station. "Some of them were caught in the streets, with their children, and were sent to Haiti — like that, without anything," Azolin said.
Workers for the Haitian government's National Office of Migration greeted the expelled Haitians and others of Haitian descent, many of them mothers with their children, including a 3-day-old boy. They were taken to a shelter north of the capital, Port-au-Prince, where they received food. They were also each given the equivalent of $22 to help them return to their former Haitian towns.
"Some people (here) have their children in the Dominican Republic, and they don't know where they are," Fritz Jimani, one of the deported people, said in Spanish. Azolin, who was at the shelter, said the actual number of people who were deported, and were eager to leave the Dominican Republic because of fears of mob violence, could be more than the 244 initially reported. He said 252 people had showed up at the shelter claiming to be among those expelled and there was a report that a Dominican bus carrying 75 more deportees was en route to the border.
The Haitian government objected to the deportation. Salim Succar, an adviser to Prime Minister Laurent Lamothe, said in an email: "We have taken certain measures to welcome these people ?and disapprove of the way this repatriation was done."
Human rights advocates say the Dominican citizenship ruling could disenfranchise more than 200,000 people, many of whom have lived there for years or decades, stripping them of the documents they need to work and attend school and denying them passports needed to travel overseas.
The Dominican government announced Friday that it has developed a plan to resolve the legal status of people who could lose their citizenship because of the ruling. Details are to be released once a decree is signed and takes effect in the coming days.
PORT-AU-PRINCE, HAITI (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — The
Dominican Republic expelled at least 244 Haitians after an elderly
Dominican couple was slain in an apparent burglary near the border
between the two countries and a mob retaliated by killing a Haitian man,
two migrant advocates said Sunday.
Dominican police issued a statement saying Jose Mendez Diaz and Luja Encarnacion Diaz, both 70, were killed during an apparent home burglary in which the killers got away with two sacks of coffee. Detectives found a knife and stick at the scene.
There was no comment from the Dominican government. A group of Haitians who had been living in the southwestern Dominican town of Neiba the past several years sought refuge at a police station because they feared further reprisals, Lissaint said. Police handed the group over to soldiers who drove them to the border and expelled them to Haiti on Saturday.
Migrant advocates said some of the people sent out of the Dominican Republic were eager to leave because they feared there would be more mob violence. Haiti and the Dominican Republic have a long history of acrimony as neighbors on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. But relations between the two have worsened since a Dominican court decision in September threatened to revoke citizenship for residents of the Dominican Republic of Haitian descent.
Jean-Baptiste Azolin, deputy coordinator for the Support Group for Repatriates and Refugees, said not all the people who were repatriated were picked up at the police station. "Some of them were caught in the streets, with their children, and were sent to Haiti — like that, without anything," Azolin said.
Workers for the Haitian government's National Office of Migration greeted the expelled Haitians and others of Haitian descent, many of them mothers with their children, including a 3-day-old boy. They were taken to a shelter north of the capital, Port-au-Prince, where they received food. They were also each given the equivalent of $22 to help them return to their former Haitian towns.
"Some people (here) have their children in the Dominican Republic, and they don't know where they are," Fritz Jimani, one of the deported people, said in Spanish. Azolin, who was at the shelter, said the actual number of people who were deported, and were eager to leave the Dominican Republic because of fears of mob violence, could be more than the 244 initially reported. He said 252 people had showed up at the shelter claiming to be among those expelled and there was a report that a Dominican bus carrying 75 more deportees was en route to the border.
The Haitian government objected to the deportation. Salim Succar, an adviser to Prime Minister Laurent Lamothe, said in an email: "We have taken certain measures to welcome these people ?and disapprove of the way this repatriation was done."
Human rights advocates say the Dominican citizenship ruling could disenfranchise more than 200,000 people, many of whom have lived there for years or decades, stripping them of the documents they need to work and attend school and denying them passports needed to travel overseas.
The Dominican government announced Friday that it has developed a plan to resolve the legal status of people who could lose their citizenship because of the ruling. Details are to be released once a decree is signed and takes effect in the coming days.
Associated Press Television News contributed to this report.
Trenton Daniel on Twitter: http://twitter.com/trentondaniel .
Trenton Daniel on Twitter: http://twitter.com/trentondaniel .
The Unique Role Basketball Plays In Developing Nigeria's Economy
By Alicia Jessop,
Forbes, November 24, 2013
The Nigerian economy is in the midst of a renaissance. Led largely by the oil industry’s presence in the country, experts expect Nigeria’s economy to overtake South Africa’s as the largest in the African continent within the decade. Some expect that feat to come as soon as the end of 2013, due to a rebasing of Nigeria’s GDP from 1990 to 2008, which will reportedly cause the country’s reported GDP to soar.
Nigeria’s economy has grown and become more stable since democracy came to the country through the end of militarization in 1999. While Nigeria’s government and economy are on the upswing, jobs have been slow to come to the country. A 2013 survey by Gallup found that only 9-percent of Nigerians reported they were employed full-time in 2012. That survey also found that 34-percent of Nigerians listed job creation as the most important issue for the Nigerian government to address. This issue beat out every other issue posed in the survey, including corruption. With 63.1-percent of Nigeria’s population falling under the age of 24 and over two-thirds of its population living on less than $1.25 per day, job creation is critical to sustaining Nigeria’s growth and political freedom.
Earlier this month, a group of unlikely sources banded together to address the need of job opportunities and leadership development for Nigeria’s rising labor force. In November, the NBA along with WNBA, Africare and ExxonMobil launched an initiative aimed at using basketball to develop health, leadership and life skills for Nigeria’s youth. The initiative, called “Power Forward,” will provide opportunities to 300 students in ten public and private high schools in Nigeria’s capital, Abuja. Boys and girls will be equally represented in the program, which will utilize classroom and athletic activities led by coaches aimed at teaching students leadership skills and building health awareness. A main emphasis of the program is goal setting, which will be facilitated by program leaders evaluating the initiative’s participants at different stages of the program.
In supporting the initiative, one thing the NBA, WNBA, Africare and ExxonMobil committed themselves to ensuring was that each school has the necessary supplies, including basketball equipment, to facilitate the initiative’s mission. While seemingly innocuous, this commitment is perhaps the most necessary factor for building a stronger basketball presence in the country. That basketball presence, in turn, will hopefully lead to job creation for Nigerians.
A solid infrastructure is one of the greatest factors preventing Nigerian youth from excelling at basketball. Currently, soccer is the most-played sport amongst Nigerian youth. Ugo Udezue, a Nigerian-born NBA agent explained the infrastructure that is necessary for the growth of basketball in Nigeria. ”Soccer is the biggest sport in the country, because soccer is easily accessible–all you need is a ball. You don’t need a built-in infrastructure to play the sport. With basketball, though, you need more of an infrastructure. You need a court and hoops to play. And in Nigeria, there aren’t many of them,” he said.
Given the lack of an existing basketball infrastructure within the country, it is perhaps surprising that since the NBA’s founding, over 20 Nigerian-born players have found their way onto the league’s hardwood. Arguably the greatest of the group, Hakeem Olajuwon, like so many other Nigerian-born children, grew up playing soccer. It wasn’t until an initiative similar to Power Forward came to Olajuwon’s home in his teenage years, that the twelve-time NBA All-Star, two-time NBA Champion and 1994 NBA MVP picked up a basketball. ”I’m one of the beneficiaries of a program like this. About 32 years ago, basketball was introduced to my school during my senior year. I know how that impacted myself, my friends and other schools,” Olajuwon said.
Olajuwon is succinct in explaining the role that basketball played in molding his future: ”Basketball changed my life.” He goes on to explain, “It gave me an opportunity to go to school on a basketball scholarship, and from there, to be a professional.” Thus, it’s no surprise that he is one of the biggest supporters of the Power Forward initiative. ”It’s always been a dream of mine to see the NBA in Nigeria developing a grassroots program that could also be a vehicle for life skills. For the NBA to actually develop a program in Nigerian schools is such a wonderful program. I feel very privileged that the NBA came to Africa and looked at Nigeria as a platform for doing this,” Olajuwon noted.
Olajuwon firmly believes that Nigeria is the perfect place to not only develop future basketball talent, but to provide young people with the life skills necessary to chart the course of a newly democratic nation. ”We have all of the talent here in Nigeria. All they are looking for, are the same opportunities as others to develop that talent,” he said.
Olajuwon isn’t alone in his belief that basketball is a gateway for Nigeria’s continued economic growth. Udezue cites Nigeria’s booming film industry, nicknamed “Nollywood,” as an example of how sports and entertainment opportunities can build the country’s economy. Nigeria’s film industry ranks second in the world in annual film productions, putting it ahead of the United States and behind India. ”When the film industry exploded, it brought a lot of revenue to the country. Different people were becoming employed and different avenues for businesses were opened,” Udezue noted.
Using the success of Nigeria’s film industry as an example, Udezue argues that Nigerian leaders could be swayed to follow another method unconventional to economic growth to build the country’s economy. That unconventional method? Investing more resources into building the country’s basketball infrastructure.
”Most of the leaders in Nigeria don’t look at sports as a means to an end for anything. They don’t understand how you can develop the country through it or build revenue. Nigeria, though, has the natural resources necessary for basketball. Its people are tall and big. If basketball was developed in Nigeria, it could open up a whole stream of revenue for the country,” Udezue said.
While it will be some time before basketball experiences Nollywood-like heights in Nigeria, one thing is certain: The path for the sport to develop the lives of the country’s youth and in turn, impact its economy, is being paved. And paving the path’s way, are basketball’s loyal enthusiasts: the NBA, its players and former players and biggest supporters.
Pakistani Protesters Search For NATO Supply Trucks
Supporters of the Pakistani religious party Jammat-e-Islami rally
against U.S. drone strikes in Pakistani areas, in Karachi, Pakistan,
Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013.
The rally came a day after a party led by
politician and cricket star Imran Khan said it would prevent NATO supply
trucks making their way to and from Afghanistan from travelling through
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province until the U.S. stops drone strikes. The
U.S. leads the NATO coalition of troops battling the Taliban in
neighboring Afghanistan.
Some 100 protesters on the outskirts of Peshawar, the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, checked the documents of truck drivers headed toward Afghanistan as they passed through a toll booth. They shouted at the drivers, and pulled one man, Gul Zaman, out of his truck when he told them that he was carrying commercial goods to Afghanistan, not NATO supplies. Video of the incident was shown by Pakistan's GEO TV.
"Without waiting for me to take my documents out of the glove compartment, they dragged me out," Zaman said. "We are also concerned about drone attacks, but they shouldn't come down heavy on us like this."
Police were present at the scene but did not intervene to stop the protesters, some of whom were carrying wooden batons. Later in the day, one of Khan's allies, the right wing Jamaat-e-Islami party, led thousands in a protest against drone attacks and the NATO supply line in the southern port city of Karachi, where the shipments originate.
Khan, whose Tehreek-e-Insaf party controls the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provincial government, has been a vocal critic of drone attacks. He and other officials say the strikes are a violation of the country's sovereignty, although the federal government is known to have secretly supported some of the attacks in the past.
Khan led thousands of supporters in a protest near Peshawar on Saturday in which they blocked a road that led to one of two border crossings used by trucks carrying NATO supplies in and out of Afghanistan. The other crossing is in southwest Baluchistan province. The demonstration had more symbolic value than practical impact because there is normally very little NATO supply traffic on the weekend.
Federal Information Minister Pervez Rashid accused Khan on Sunday of trying to damage Pakistan's relationship with NATO countries and neighboring Afghanistan. "Anyone who wants to disturb our relations with neighbors is not serving the country," Rashid said. "Because of Imran Khan we could be isolated in the world."
Rashid said on Saturday that the federal government's anti-drone stance was clear and accused Khan of "playing politics" with the issue. Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has also been a vocal critic of drone strikes since he took office in June. He pushed President Barack Obama to end the attacks during a visit to Washington in October, but the U.S. has shown no indication it will stop using a tool it views as vital for battling al-Qaida and the Taliban.
Khan has pushed the federal government to block NATO supplies across the country to force the U.S. to end drone strikes, but it has shown little interest in doing so. While Sharif has said he wants the attacks to end, he has also made clear that he values a friendly relationship with the U.S. It's unclear if the government will take action to prevent Khan's supporters from stopping NATO supply trucks.
The land routes through Pakistan have been key to getting supplies to NATO troops in Afghanistan. They now increasingly are being used to ship equipment out of Afghanistan as the U.S. seeks to withdraw most of its combat troops from the country by the end of 2014.
The routes have been closed in the past. The Pakistani government blocked the routes for seven months following U.S. airstrikes that accidentally killed two dozen soldiers on the Afghan border in November 2011. Pakistan finally reopened the routes after the U.S. apologized.
Also Sunday, a roadside bomb killed two Pakistanis soldiers and wounded five others in the North Waziristan tribal area, said military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with military policy. They accused the Pakistani Taliban of planting the bomb.
PESHAWAR, PAKISTAN (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — Demonstrators protesting
U.S. drone strikes roughed up drivers Sunday as they sought to stop
trucks carrying NATO troop supplies and equipment from passing through
northwest Pakistan.
Some 100 protesters on the outskirts of Peshawar, the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, checked the documents of truck drivers headed toward Afghanistan as they passed through a toll booth. They shouted at the drivers, and pulled one man, Gul Zaman, out of his truck when he told them that he was carrying commercial goods to Afghanistan, not NATO supplies. Video of the incident was shown by Pakistan's GEO TV.
"Without waiting for me to take my documents out of the glove compartment, they dragged me out," Zaman said. "We are also concerned about drone attacks, but they shouldn't come down heavy on us like this."
Police were present at the scene but did not intervene to stop the protesters, some of whom were carrying wooden batons. Later in the day, one of Khan's allies, the right wing Jamaat-e-Islami party, led thousands in a protest against drone attacks and the NATO supply line in the southern port city of Karachi, where the shipments originate.
Khan, whose Tehreek-e-Insaf party controls the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provincial government, has been a vocal critic of drone attacks. He and other officials say the strikes are a violation of the country's sovereignty, although the federal government is known to have secretly supported some of the attacks in the past.
Khan led thousands of supporters in a protest near Peshawar on Saturday in which they blocked a road that led to one of two border crossings used by trucks carrying NATO supplies in and out of Afghanistan. The other crossing is in southwest Baluchistan province. The demonstration had more symbolic value than practical impact because there is normally very little NATO supply traffic on the weekend.
Federal Information Minister Pervez Rashid accused Khan on Sunday of trying to damage Pakistan's relationship with NATO countries and neighboring Afghanistan. "Anyone who wants to disturb our relations with neighbors is not serving the country," Rashid said. "Because of Imran Khan we could be isolated in the world."
Rashid said on Saturday that the federal government's anti-drone stance was clear and accused Khan of "playing politics" with the issue. Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has also been a vocal critic of drone strikes since he took office in June. He pushed President Barack Obama to end the attacks during a visit to Washington in October, but the U.S. has shown no indication it will stop using a tool it views as vital for battling al-Qaida and the Taliban.
Khan has pushed the federal government to block NATO supplies across the country to force the U.S. to end drone strikes, but it has shown little interest in doing so. While Sharif has said he wants the attacks to end, he has also made clear that he values a friendly relationship with the U.S. It's unclear if the government will take action to prevent Khan's supporters from stopping NATO supply trucks.
The land routes through Pakistan have been key to getting supplies to NATO troops in Afghanistan. They now increasingly are being used to ship equipment out of Afghanistan as the U.S. seeks to withdraw most of its combat troops from the country by the end of 2014.
The routes have been closed in the past. The Pakistani government blocked the routes for seven months following U.S. airstrikes that accidentally killed two dozen soldiers on the Afghan border in November 2011. Pakistan finally reopened the routes after the U.S. apologized.
Also Sunday, a roadside bomb killed two Pakistanis soldiers and wounded five others in the North Waziristan tribal area, said military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with military policy. They accused the Pakistani Taliban of planting the bomb.
Associated Press writers Zarar Khan and Sebastian Abbot in Islamabad and Adil Jawad in Karachi contributed to this report.
Analysis: Iran Deal Leaves Israel Few Options
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chairs the weekly cabinet
meeting at his office in Jerusalem, Israel, Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013. After
feverishly trying to derail the international community's nuclear deal
with Iran in recent weeks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now
has little choice but to accept an agreement that he has derided as
deeply flawed.
Netanyahu believes the six-month deal leaves Iran's
military nuclear capabilities largely intact, while giving Iran relief
from painful economic sanctions, undermining negotiations on the next
stage. At the same time, Israel's strongest piece of leverage, the
threat of a military strike on Iran, seems to be out of the question
despite Netanyahu's insistence it would remain on the table.
"Today the world became a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world made a significant step in obtaining the most dangerous weapons in the world," Netanyahu told his Cabinet on Sunday, calling the deal a "historic mistake."
He said Israel was not bound by the agreement, and reiterated Israel's right to "defend itself by itself," a veiled reference to a possible military strike against Iran. Netanyahu has spent years warning the world against the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran, calling it an existential threat due to Iranian references to Israel's destruction, its support of hostile militant groups on Israel's borders and its development of missiles capable of reaching Israel and beyond.
Israel also believes that a nuclear-armed Iran will provide militant groups like Lebanon's Hezbollah an "umbrella" of protection that will embolden them to carry out attacks. As momentum for a deal built the past week, Netanyahu delivered speech after speech and held meeting after meeting, urging the world to seek better terms from Iran. Last week, he hosted French President Francois Hollande, then rushed off to Moscow for talks with President Vladimir Putin in a last-ditch attempt to alter the agreement.
Netanyahu had said that any deal must ensure that Iran's enriching of uranium — a key step toward making a nuclear bomb — must end. He also said all enriched material should be removed from the Islamic Republic, and called for the demolition of a plutonium reactor under construction.
But after the deal was announced, it was clear that Netanyahu made little headway. While freezing parts of Iran's enrichment capabilities, it will leave others, including the centrifuges that are used for enrichment, intact. The deal relies heavily on Iranian goodwill, a still-to-be-defined system of international inspections and the continued pain of sanctions that remain in place.
Yoel Guzansky, who used to monitor the Iranian nuclear program for Israel's National Security Council, said a deal that would satisfy Israel was unlikely from the outset due to differing "red lines" between Israel and the U.S.
While Israel sees any enrichment as a cause for concern, the U.S. was willing to tolerate nuclear development as long as it was unable to produce weapons, said Guzansky, who is now an analyst at the Institute for National Security Studies, a Tel Aviv think tank.
"It's a bad agreement because of what it symbolizes," he said. "It means Iran is getting an acceptance, a signature that it's a legitimate country." Even worse for Israel, he added, the agreement amounts to "acceptance of Iran as a nuclear threshold state."
U.S. officials said Sunday's deal was just a first step and further negotiations aim for a final agreement that would prevent any threat from Iran's nuclear program. They said the relief from sanctions was minimal and that the most biting economic measures, including sanctions on Iran's vital oil industry, remained in place and more could be imposed if Iran fails to follow through.
Guzansky predicted that despite the tough rhetoric, Israel would move quickly to repair relations with the U.S., its closest and most important ally, and do everything possible to influence the outcome of the world's final-status talks with Iran.
That could include speeches, threats of military action or behind-the-scenes diplomacy. Israel is not a direct participant in the talks but remains in close contact with many of the negotiators. The relationship with the U.S. will be critical as Israel conducts peace talks with the Palestinians in the coming months. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, who is mediating the talks, has set an April target date for reaching an agreement, and there is widespread speculation that the Americans will step up their involvement as the deadline approaches.
Guzansky also said Israel's main card — military action — appears to be out of the question right now.
"How can Israel, after the entire international community sat with Iran, shook hands with Iran and signed an agreement, operate independently?" he said. "It will be seen as someone who sabotages 10 years of trying to get Iran to the table and trying to get a deal."
Enrichment is at the heart of the dispute because it can be used for peaceful purposes or for producing a nuclear bomb. Tehran insists its nuclear program is for civilian usage such as energy production and cancer treatment.
Uranium at low levels of enrichment, up to 20 percent, is used in research or generating electricity. Uranium must be enriched to a far higher level — above 90 percent — to produce a warhead. So far, Iran is not known to have produced any at that level, but Israel argues that the technology for doing so is the same as that for enriching at lower levels.
Under the compromise, enrichment would be capped at the 5 percent level, and Iran's stockpile of 20 percent uranium would be "neutralized," effectively preventing it from reaching weapons-grade level. Also construction on the plutonium reactor is to be suspended. The White House also promised "intrusive monitoring" of Iranian nuclear facilities.
Israel says any enriched uranium in Iranian hands is potentially dangerous, since its centrifuges can quickly convert it to weapons grade. Israel believes that Iran's ability to keep its nuclear infrastructure intact will allow it to can quickly resume the program if the later talks fail.
"Iran is a threshold nuclear country," said Netanyahu's Cabinet minister for intelligence affairs, Yuval Steinitz. "So far it was completely against U.N. security resolutions, and now it gets some kind of recognition at least for the next six months as a threshold nuclear country."
In all, about 250 kilograms (550 pounds) of highly enriched uranium is needed to make a weapon. Iran already has about 200 kilograms (440 pounds) of enriched uranium. Ephraim Asculai, a former official at Israel's Atomic Energy Commission, said Sunday's agreement was not all bad for Israel, since it capped enrichment activity and slowed construction of the plutonium reactor. But he said Iran's ability to "break out" and make a nuclear explosive device remained intact, perhaps in as little as four to six months once a decision is made.
"The good part of the deal is that enrichment stops at the present level and that is also some of the bad news because enrichment does go on," he said.
JERUSALEM (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — After feverishly trying to derail
the international community's nuclear deal with Iran in recent weeks,
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now has little choice but to
accept an agreement that he has derided as deeply flawed.
"Today the world became a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world made a significant step in obtaining the most dangerous weapons in the world," Netanyahu told his Cabinet on Sunday, calling the deal a "historic mistake."
He said Israel was not bound by the agreement, and reiterated Israel's right to "defend itself by itself," a veiled reference to a possible military strike against Iran. Netanyahu has spent years warning the world against the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran, calling it an existential threat due to Iranian references to Israel's destruction, its support of hostile militant groups on Israel's borders and its development of missiles capable of reaching Israel and beyond.
Israel also believes that a nuclear-armed Iran will provide militant groups like Lebanon's Hezbollah an "umbrella" of protection that will embolden them to carry out attacks. As momentum for a deal built the past week, Netanyahu delivered speech after speech and held meeting after meeting, urging the world to seek better terms from Iran. Last week, he hosted French President Francois Hollande, then rushed off to Moscow for talks with President Vladimir Putin in a last-ditch attempt to alter the agreement.
Netanyahu had said that any deal must ensure that Iran's enriching of uranium — a key step toward making a nuclear bomb — must end. He also said all enriched material should be removed from the Islamic Republic, and called for the demolition of a plutonium reactor under construction.
But after the deal was announced, it was clear that Netanyahu made little headway. While freezing parts of Iran's enrichment capabilities, it will leave others, including the centrifuges that are used for enrichment, intact. The deal relies heavily on Iranian goodwill, a still-to-be-defined system of international inspections and the continued pain of sanctions that remain in place.
Yoel Guzansky, who used to monitor the Iranian nuclear program for Israel's National Security Council, said a deal that would satisfy Israel was unlikely from the outset due to differing "red lines" between Israel and the U.S.
While Israel sees any enrichment as a cause for concern, the U.S. was willing to tolerate nuclear development as long as it was unable to produce weapons, said Guzansky, who is now an analyst at the Institute for National Security Studies, a Tel Aviv think tank.
"It's a bad agreement because of what it symbolizes," he said. "It means Iran is getting an acceptance, a signature that it's a legitimate country." Even worse for Israel, he added, the agreement amounts to "acceptance of Iran as a nuclear threshold state."
U.S. officials said Sunday's deal was just a first step and further negotiations aim for a final agreement that would prevent any threat from Iran's nuclear program. They said the relief from sanctions was minimal and that the most biting economic measures, including sanctions on Iran's vital oil industry, remained in place and more could be imposed if Iran fails to follow through.
Guzansky predicted that despite the tough rhetoric, Israel would move quickly to repair relations with the U.S., its closest and most important ally, and do everything possible to influence the outcome of the world's final-status talks with Iran.
That could include speeches, threats of military action or behind-the-scenes diplomacy. Israel is not a direct participant in the talks but remains in close contact with many of the negotiators. The relationship with the U.S. will be critical as Israel conducts peace talks with the Palestinians in the coming months. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, who is mediating the talks, has set an April target date for reaching an agreement, and there is widespread speculation that the Americans will step up their involvement as the deadline approaches.
Guzansky also said Israel's main card — military action — appears to be out of the question right now.
"How can Israel, after the entire international community sat with Iran, shook hands with Iran and signed an agreement, operate independently?" he said. "It will be seen as someone who sabotages 10 years of trying to get Iran to the table and trying to get a deal."
Enrichment is at the heart of the dispute because it can be used for peaceful purposes or for producing a nuclear bomb. Tehran insists its nuclear program is for civilian usage such as energy production and cancer treatment.
Uranium at low levels of enrichment, up to 20 percent, is used in research or generating electricity. Uranium must be enriched to a far higher level — above 90 percent — to produce a warhead. So far, Iran is not known to have produced any at that level, but Israel argues that the technology for doing so is the same as that for enriching at lower levels.
Under the compromise, enrichment would be capped at the 5 percent level, and Iran's stockpile of 20 percent uranium would be "neutralized," effectively preventing it from reaching weapons-grade level. Also construction on the plutonium reactor is to be suspended. The White House also promised "intrusive monitoring" of Iranian nuclear facilities.
Israel says any enriched uranium in Iranian hands is potentially dangerous, since its centrifuges can quickly convert it to weapons grade. Israel believes that Iran's ability to keep its nuclear infrastructure intact will allow it to can quickly resume the program if the later talks fail.
"Iran is a threshold nuclear country," said Netanyahu's Cabinet minister for intelligence affairs, Yuval Steinitz. "So far it was completely against U.N. security resolutions, and now it gets some kind of recognition at least for the next six months as a threshold nuclear country."
In all, about 250 kilograms (550 pounds) of highly enriched uranium is needed to make a weapon. Iran already has about 200 kilograms (440 pounds) of enriched uranium. Ephraim Asculai, a former official at Israel's Atomic Energy Commission, said Sunday's agreement was not all bad for Israel, since it capped enrichment activity and slowed construction of the plutonium reactor. But he said Iran's ability to "break out" and make a nuclear explosive device remained intact, perhaps in as little as four to six months once a decision is made.
"The good part of the deal is that enrichment stops at the present level and that is also some of the bad news because enrichment does go on," he said.
Federman is AP's news editor based in Jerusalem and has covered Israel since 2003.
Hondurans Head To Polls With Violence As Top Worry
A soldier stands guard outside a polling station in Tegucigalpa,
Honduras, Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013. Hondurans were choosing a new president
Sunday in a country reeling from violence, poverty and the legacy of a
2009 coup, and if polls are accurate, the vote could fail to produce a
clear winner. The election pits Xiomara Castro, whose husband Manuel
Zelaya was overthrown in a military-backed coup, against Juan Orlando
Hernandez, the candidate of the ruling conservative National Party.
The election pits Xiomara Castro, whose husband
Manuel Zelaya was overthrown in a military-backed coup, against Juan
Orlando Hernandez, the candidate of the ruling conservative National
Party. No problems were reported after polling places opened at 8 a.m.
EST (1300 GMT).
Polls show the two candidates in a statistical tie, raising fears of a disputed result that could produce more instability and protests in a failing state with 8.5 million people and the world's highest homicide rate.
Many, including U.S. Ambassador in Honduras, Lisa Kubiske, have called on both candidates to wait for official results before declaring victory, a process that could take several days. Castro, 54, had been leading for months as the candidate for change, promising relief from the violence and poverty that have only increased in the four years since President Porfirio Lobo took office.
Hernandez, 45, has seen his numbers surge in recent weeks by casting himself as the candidate of law and order, the top issue for most voters in a country overrun by gangs trafficking much of the cocaine heading from South America to the U.S.
As president of Congress, Hernandez has pushed through legislation creating a military police force to patrol the streets in place of the National Police, which are penetrated by corruption and often accused of extrajudicial killings.
About 250 international observers from the European Union, the United States and the Organization of American States are monitoring the election. The constitution says the victor needs to win only by one vote. There is no runoff, and the electoral tribunal decides whether a recount is necessary.
Zelaya, a wealthy rancher, was deposed by his own Liberal party after he started taking a populist line and aligned himself with the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. He was attempting to hold a referendum on whether to reform the constitution, something the Supreme Court called illegal, when he was whisked out of the country at gunpoint.
The National Party won regularly scheduled elections later that year.
TEGUCIGALPA, HONDURAS (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — Hondurans were choosing a
new president Sunday in a country reeling from violence, poverty and
the legacy of a 2009 coup, and if polls are accurate, the vote could
fail to produce a clear winner.
Polls show the two candidates in a statistical tie, raising fears of a disputed result that could produce more instability and protests in a failing state with 8.5 million people and the world's highest homicide rate.
Many, including U.S. Ambassador in Honduras, Lisa Kubiske, have called on both candidates to wait for official results before declaring victory, a process that could take several days. Castro, 54, had been leading for months as the candidate for change, promising relief from the violence and poverty that have only increased in the four years since President Porfirio Lobo took office.
Hernandez, 45, has seen his numbers surge in recent weeks by casting himself as the candidate of law and order, the top issue for most voters in a country overrun by gangs trafficking much of the cocaine heading from South America to the U.S.
As president of Congress, Hernandez has pushed through legislation creating a military police force to patrol the streets in place of the National Police, which are penetrated by corruption and often accused of extrajudicial killings.
About 250 international observers from the European Union, the United States and the Organization of American States are monitoring the election. The constitution says the victor needs to win only by one vote. There is no runoff, and the electoral tribunal decides whether a recount is necessary.
Zelaya, a wealthy rancher, was deposed by his own Liberal party after he started taking a populist line and aligned himself with the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. He was attempting to hold a referendum on whether to reform the constitution, something the Supreme Court called illegal, when he was whisked out of the country at gunpoint.
The National Party won regularly scheduled elections later that year.
Ugandan Midwife To Receive France’s Order Of Merit
A midwife from rural Uganda will receive France's National Order of Merit on Monday. France is honoring Esther Madudu for her work and as an advocate for the Pan African Campaign Stand Up For African Mothers.
By Laura Angela Bagnetto, RFI
Esther Madudu, a mother of two children herself, often works 12-hour days in Kapuwai, Uganda, a village in the northeast of the country, delivering up to five babies a night.
“In our harsh conditions, where we lack equipment, when you want to resuscitate a baby, you don’t have a food sucker, you don’t have an oxygen cylinder because we don’t have electricity,” she says.
“You really want to resuscitate that baby, because you imagine, by the time you refer that baby to the referral hospital it will have died on the way,” she adds. The Association for Medicine and Research in Africa (AMREF) estimates that 33-year-old Madudu has saved more than 1,000 babies and their mothers while working in rural Pallisa District.
Monday also marks the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.
Madudu herself has been a victim of domestic violence, and tells RFI that many African women have been raped at some time during their life. “They are the source of everything—the source of life, the source of water, the source of education. Mothers in Africa, they work a lot. Twenty-four hours a day, doing everything for their family.”
The burden of responsibility also makes them vulnerable, she says. “The man who has been relaxing during the daytime, he comes, he wants it, the woman is not prepared, so, the man is drunk, he wants it […]so, a woman is raped, because she is not ready.”
Madudu is passionate about working to lower the infant mortality rate with AMREF, which she says motivates her because the work of midwives was not recognized before. “It keeps me smiling, because I know more lives of women are going to be saved then ever before.”
In addition to receiving the Order of Merit, Madudu is also in the running for the 2015 Nobel Peace Prize, as a representative for all African midwives.
By Laura Angela Bagnetto, RFI
Esther Madudu, a mother of two children herself, often works 12-hour days in Kapuwai, Uganda, a village in the northeast of the country, delivering up to five babies a night.
“In our harsh conditions, where we lack equipment, when you want to resuscitate a baby, you don’t have a food sucker, you don’t have an oxygen cylinder because we don’t have electricity,” she says.
“You really want to resuscitate that baby, because you imagine, by the time you refer that baby to the referral hospital it will have died on the way,” she adds. The Association for Medicine and Research in Africa (AMREF) estimates that 33-year-old Madudu has saved more than 1,000 babies and their mothers while working in rural Pallisa District.
Monday also marks the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women.
Madudu herself has been a victim of domestic violence, and tells RFI that many African women have been raped at some time during their life. “They are the source of everything—the source of life, the source of water, the source of education. Mothers in Africa, they work a lot. Twenty-four hours a day, doing everything for their family.”
The burden of responsibility also makes them vulnerable, she says. “The man who has been relaxing during the daytime, he comes, he wants it, the woman is not prepared, so, the man is drunk, he wants it […]so, a woman is raped, because she is not ready.”
Madudu is passionate about working to lower the infant mortality rate with AMREF, which she says motivates her because the work of midwives was not recognized before. “It keeps me smiling, because I know more lives of women are going to be saved then ever before.”
In addition to receiving the Order of Merit, Madudu is also in the running for the 2015 Nobel Peace Prize, as a representative for all African midwives.
Mali Goes To Polls Under Threat Of Islamist Violence
A man casts his vote at a polling station in Bamako, the capital of Mali, on November 24, 2013 (AFP, Habibou Kouyate)
By Serge Daniel, AFP
Bamako (AFP) — Malians voted on Sunday in parliamentary elections intended to cap the troubled west African nation's return to democracy but overshadowed by the threat of Islamist reprisals.
The polls mark Mali's first steps to recovery after it was plunged into chaos by a military coup in March last year, finalising a process begun with the election of its first post-conflict president in August.
Some 6.5 million Malians are eligible to cast ballots for a new national assembly, with more than 1,000 candidates running for 147 seats -- but turnout initially looked weak in the capital Bamako, according to an AFP correspondent.
"I see... that there are not many people here -- the candidates weren't able to mobilise -- but I hope that in the afternoon there will be more people," said Oumou Sawadogo, a voter at a polling station set up in a school.
In another voting centre, Boubacar Tembely said he had come to vote despite feeling bitter about how little progress has been made in Mali.
"The politicians are all the same. I left my ballot blank as a protest to them," he told AFP.
Voting takes place amid an upsurge in violence by Al-Qaeda-linked rebels who stalk the vast northern desert, an ever-present danger to French and African troops who are tasked with providing security for the election alongside the Malian army.
French security forces witnessed their first attack in the capital Bamako on Friday, when a police officer working with the army was lucky to escape serious injury after a gunman believed to be influenced by Islamists opened fire on him.
A day earlier militants had shelled the northern city of Gao, and although their rockets fell harmlessly short of the main urban centre, the attack underlined the continuing security threat.
Al-Qaeda-linked insurgents ousted by French and African troops in January from the northern towns they had occupied last year resumed their deadly insurgency on September 28, after a lull of several months.
Since then, a dozen civilians as well as Malian and Chadian soldiers in the United Nations' MINUSMA peacekeeping mission have been killed in the country's vast desert north.
Much of the worry ahead of the polls has been focused on the largely lawless region of Kidal, occupied for five months by ethnic Tuareg separatists until a ceasefire accord signed in June allowed in the Malian army.
In a grisly reminder for the West of the ongoing security crisis, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) on November 2 kidnapped and shot dead two French radio journalists who had come to Kidal, the capital of the region, 1,500 kilometres (930 miles) northeast of Bamako.
Keita seeks 'comfortable majority'
UN peacekeepers, the Malian army and French troops are tasked with ensuring voters' safety in the region, the stronghold of the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA).
Malians are voting for a new parliament following the 2012 coup that toppled democratically elected president Amadou Toumani Toure and created an opening that allowed the MNLA and groups allied to Al-Qaeda to seize northern Mali.
A UN peacekeeping mission expected eventually to number more than 12,000 troops is charged with ensuring security as Mali rebuilds, allowing France to withdraw all but 1,000 of the 4,500 troops it sent to its former colony.
The three-week election campaign never caught fire in Mali, and analysts are predicting a lower turnout than the 50 percent achieved in the presidential election won by former prime minister Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, known widely as IBK.
The ruling Rally for Mali (RPM) party has vowed to deliver "a comfortable majority" to smoothe the way for the reforms Keita plans to put in place to rebuild Mali's stagnant economy and soothe simmering ethnic tensions in the north.
In the central town of Kati, the headquarters of the junta, turnout looked as weak as in Bamako.
A student who gave her name as Nafissatou said she voted for Keita in August but had decided to cast her ballot for the opposition this time around.
"IBK could not settle the matter of the north. I'm disappointed," she said.
The election will be supervised by hundreds of Malian and international observers, including a European Union mission and a 100-strong team from the ECOWAS regional bloc.
A second round will take place on December 15 if no party is able to form a government following Sunday's vote.
Malians voted on Sunday in parliamentary elections intended to seal the troubled west African nation's return to democracy but overshadowed by the threat of Islamist reprisals.
The polls mark Mali's first steps to recovery after it was plunged into chaos by a military coup in March last year, and finalise a process begun with the election of its first post-conflict president in August.
Some 6.5 million Malians are eligible to cast ballots for a new national assembly, with more than 1,000 candidates running for 147 seats -- but turnout initially looked weak across the country.
"I see... that there are not many people here -- the candidates weren't able to mobilise -- but I hope that in the afternoon there will be more people," said Oumou Sawadogo, a voter at a polling station set up in a school in the capital Bamako.
In another voting centre, Boubacar Tembely said he had come to vote despite feeling bitter about how little progress has been made in Mali.
"The politicians are all the same. I left my ballot blank as a protest to them," he told AFP.
Voting takes place amid an upsurge in violence by Al-Qaeda-linked rebels who stalk the vast northern desert, an ever-present danger to French and African troops who are tasked with providing security for the election alongside the Malian army.
Al-Qaeda-linked insurgents ousted by French and African troops in January from the northern towns they had occupied last year resumed their deadly insurgency on September 28, after a lull of several months.
Since then, a dozen civilians as well as Malian and Chadian soldiers in the United Nations' MINUSMA peacekeeping mission have been killed in the country's vast desert north while French security personnel were targeted for the first time last week.
Much of the worry ahead of the polls has been focused on the largely lawless region of Kidal, occupied for five months by ethnic Tuareg separatists until a ceasefire accord signed in June allowed in the Malian army.
In a grisly reminder for the West of the ongoing security crisis, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) on November 2 kidnapped and shot dead two French radio journalists who had come to the region's capital, also called Kidal, 1,500 kilometres (930 miles) northeast of Bamako.
Keita seeks 'comfortable majority'
Voting began in an atmosphere of calm across the vast desert north, according to witnesses contacted by AFP from Bamako.
"It's going well here. The only problem is that there is no rush at the moment. In some polling stations, there are even more election officials that voters," local electoral commission head Oumar Toure said in Kidal.
Officials in Gao and Timbuktu also reported a weak turnout but said they expected voting to pick up in the afternoon.
"It's slow at the moment but women generally go to the market before coming to vote," said Ousmane Guindo, a youth activist in Gao.
UN peacekeepers, the Malian army and French troops are tasked with ensuring voters' safety in the region, the stronghold of the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA).
Malians are voting for a new parliament following the 2012 coup that toppled democratically elected president Amadou Toumani Toure and created an opening that allowed the MNLA and groups allied to Al-Qaeda to seize northern Mali.
The ruling Rally for Mali (RPM) party has vowed to deliver "a comfortable majority" to smoothe the way for the reforms President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita plans to put in place to rebuild Mali's stagnant economy and soothe simmering ethnic tensions in the north.
The election is being monitored by hundreds of Malian and international observers, including a European Union mission and a 100-strong team from the ECOWAS regional bloc.
Louis Michel, head of the EU's mission observation mission told reporters at a polling station in Bamako he was impressed with the organisation of the vote and the even spread of men and women casting ballots.
"Election officials know what they are doing. Everything seems to be going as it should. From a logistical point of view, I didn't observe anything unusual," he said.
He said unrest in the north should not be a bar to successful elections there.
"There are no perfect elections and there will always be problems. But I see a willingness to be better, a virtuous recovery process, so I am optimistic. The most important thing is that the elections take place at all."
A second round will take place on December 15 if no party is able to form a government following Sunday's vote.
Secret US-Iran Talks Set Stage For Nuke Deal
Retired-FBI agent Robert Levinson who went missing on the Iranian island
of Kish in March 2007 and Levinson's family received these photographs
of him in April 2011. In secret face-to-face talks with Iran, aimed at a
deal to slow Iran's nuclear program, the U.S. team in a March 2013
meeting also raised concerns about Syria, Tehran's threats to close the
Strait of Hormuz and the status of Levinson.
The discussions were kept hidden even from
America's closest friends, including its negotiating partners and
Israel, until two months ago, and that may explain how the nuclear
accord appeared to come together so quickly after years of stalemate and
fierce hostility between Iran and the West.
But the secrecy of the talks may also explain some of the tensions between the U.S. and France, which earlier this month balked at a proposed deal, and with Israel, which is furious about the agreement and has angrily denounced the diplomatic outreach to Tehran.
President Barack Obama personally authorized the talks as part of his effort — promised in his first inaugural address — to reach out to a country the State Department designates as the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism.
The talks were held in the Middle Eastern nation of Oman and elsewhere with only a tight circle of people in the know, the AP learned. Since March, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns and Jake Sullivan, Vice President Joe Biden's top foreign policy adviser, have met at least five times with Iranian officials.
The last four clandestine meetings, held since Iran's reform-minded President Hassan Rouhani was inaugurated in August, produced much of the agreement later formally hammered out in negotiations in Geneva among the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China, Germany and Iran, said three senior administration officials. All spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss by name the highly sensitive diplomatic effort.
The AP was tipped to the first U.S.-Iranian meeting in March shortly after it occurred, but the White House and State Department disputed elements of the account and the AP could not confirm the meeting. The AP learned of further indications of secret diplomacy in the fall and pressed the White House and other officials further. As the Geneva talks appeared to be reaching their conclusion, senior administration officials confirmed to the AP the details of the extensive outreach.
The Geneva deal provides Iran with about $7 billion in relief from international sanctions in exchange for Iranian curbs on uranium enrichment and other nuclear activity. All parties pledged to work toward a final accord next year that would remove remaining suspicions in the West that Tehran is trying to assemble an atomic weapons arsenal.
Iran insists its nuclear interest is only in peaceful energy production and medical research. The diplomatic gamble with Iran, if the interim agreement holds up and leads to a final pact preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, could avert years of threats of U.S. or Israeli military intervention. It could also prove a turning point in decades of hostility between Washington and Tehran — and become a crowning foreign policy achievement of Obama's presidency.
But if the deal collapses, or if Iran covertly races ahead with development of a nuclear weapon, Obama will face the consequences of failure, both at home and abroad. His gamble opens him to criticism that he has left Israel vulnerable to a country bent on its destruction and that he has made a deal with a state sponsor of terrorism.
The U.S. and Iran cut off diplomatic ties in 1979 after the Islamic Revolution and the storming of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, where 52 Americans were held hostage for more than a year. But Obama has expressed a willingness since becoming president to meet with the Iranians without conditions.
At the president's direction, the United States began a tentative outreach shortly after his inauguration in January 2009. Obama and Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, exchanged letters, but the engagement yielded no results.
That outreach was hampered by Iran's hardline former president, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, whose re-election in a disputed vote in June of that year led to a violent crackdown on opposition protesters. The next month, relations seemed at another low when Iran detained three American hikers who had strayed across the Iranian border from Iraq.
Ironically, efforts to win the release of the hikers turned out to be instrumental in making the clandestine diplomacy possible. Oman's Sultan Qaboos was a key player, facilitating the eventual release of the hikers — the last two of whom returned to the United States in 2011 — and then offering himself as a mediator for a U.S.-Iran rapprochement. The secret informal discussions between mid-level officials in Washington and Tehran began.
Officials described those early contacts as exploratory discussions focused on the logistics of setting up higher-level talks. The discussions happened through numerous channels, officials said, including face-to-face talks at undisclosed locations. They included exchanges between then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, now Obama's national security adviser, and Iran's envoy to the world body, the officials said. National Security Council aide Puneet Talwar was also involved, the officials said.
The talks took on added weight eight months ago, when Obama dispatched the deputy secretary of state Burns, the top aide Sullivan and five other officials to meet with their Iranian counterparts in the Omani capital of Muscat. Obama dispatched the group shortly after the six powers opened a new round of nuclear talks with Iran in Almaty, Kazakhstan, in late February.
At the time, those main nuclear negotiations were making little progress, and the Iranians had little interest in holding bilateral talks with the United States on the sidelines of the meeting out of fear that the discussions would become public, the U.S. officials said.
So, with the assistance of Sultan Qaboos, officials in both countries began quietly making plans to meet in Oman. Burns, Sullivan and a small team of U.S. technical experts arrived on a military plane in mid-March for the meeting with the Iranians.
The senior administration officials who spoke to the AP would not say who Burns and Sullivan met with but characterized the Iranian attendees as career diplomats, national security aides and experts on the nuclear issue who were likely to remain key players even after the country's elections this summer.
The goal on the American side, the U.S. officials said, was simply at that point to see if the U.S. and Iran could successfully arrange bilateral talks — a low bar that underscored the sour state of relations between the two nations.
Beyond nuclear issues, the officials said the U.S. team at the March Oman meeting also raised concerns about Iranian involvement in Syria, Tehran's threats to close the strategically important Strait of Hormuz and the status of Robert Levinson, a missing former FBI agent who the U.S. believes was abducted in Iran, as well as two other Americans detained in the country.
Hoping to keep the channel open, Secretary of State John Kerry then visited Oman in May on a trip ostensibly to push a military deal with the sultanate but secretly focused on maintaining that country's key mediation role, particularly after the Iranian election scheduled for the next month, the officials said.
Rouhani's election in June on a platform of easing sanctions crippling Iran's economy and stated willingness to engage with the West gave a new spark to the U.S. effort, the officials said. Two secret meetings were organized immediately after Rouhani took office in August, with the specific goal of advancing the stalled nuclear talks with world powers. Another pair of meetings took place in October.
Burns and Sullivan led the U.S. delegation at each of those sessions, and were joined at the final secret meeting by chief U.S. nuclear negotiator Wendy Sherman. The Iranian delegation was a mix of officials the Americans had met in March in Oman and others who were new to the talks, administration officials said. All of the Iranians were fluent English speakers.
U.S. officials said the meetings happened in multiple locations, but would not confirm the exact spots, saying they did not want to jeopardize their ability to use the same locations in the future. But at least some of the talks are believed to have taken place in Oman.
The private meetings coincided with a public easing of U.S.-Iranian discord. In early August, Obama sent Rouhani a letter congratulating him on his election. The Iranian leader's response was viewed positively by the White House, which quickly laid the groundwork for the additional secret talks. The U.S. officials said they were convinced that the outreach had the blessing of Ayatollah Khameni, but would not elaborate.
As negotiators continued to talk behind the scenes, public speculation swirled over a possible meeting between Obama and Rouhani on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly, which both attended in September in New York. Burns and Sullivan sought to arrange face-to-face talks, but the meeting never happened largely due to Iranian concerns, the officials said. Two days later, though, Obama and Rouhani spoke by phone — the first direct contact between a U.S. and Iranian leader in more than 30 years.
It was only after that Obama-Rouhani phone call that the U.S. began informing allies of the secret talks with Iran, the U.S. officials said. Obama handled the most sensitive conversation himself, briefing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a Sept. 30 meeting at the White House. He informed Netanyahu only about the two summer meetings, not the March talks, in keeping with the White House's promise only to tell allies about any discussions with Iran that were substantive.
The U.S. officials would not describe Netanyahu's reaction. But the next day, he delivered his General Assembly speech, blasting Rouhani as a "wolf in sheep's clothing" and warning the U.S. against mistaking a change in Iran's tone with an actual change in nuclear ambitions. The Israeli leader has subsequently denounced the potential nuclear agreement as the "deal of the century" for Iran.
After telling Netanyahu about the secret talks, the United States then briefed the other members of the six-nation negotiating team, the U.S. officials said. The last secret gatherings between the U.S. and Iran took place shortly after the General Assembly, according to the officials.
There, the deal finally reached by the parties on Sunday began to take its final shape. At this month's larger formal nuclear negotiations between world powers and Iran in Geneva, Burns and Sullivan showed up as well, but the State Department went to great lengths to conceal their involvement, leaving their names off of the official delegation list.
They were housed at a different hotel than the rest of the team, used back entrances to come and go from meeting venues and were whisked into negotiating sessions from service elevators or unused corridors only after photographers left.
WASHINGTON (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — The United States and Iran secretly
engaged in a series of high-level, face-to-face talks over the past
year, in a high-stakes diplomatic gamble by the Obama administration
that paved the way for the historic deal sealed early Sunday in Geneva
aimed at slowing Tehran's nuclear program, The Associated Press has
learned.
But the secrecy of the talks may also explain some of the tensions between the U.S. and France, which earlier this month balked at a proposed deal, and with Israel, which is furious about the agreement and has angrily denounced the diplomatic outreach to Tehran.
President Barack Obama personally authorized the talks as part of his effort — promised in his first inaugural address — to reach out to a country the State Department designates as the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism.
The talks were held in the Middle Eastern nation of Oman and elsewhere with only a tight circle of people in the know, the AP learned. Since March, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns and Jake Sullivan, Vice President Joe Biden's top foreign policy adviser, have met at least five times with Iranian officials.
The last four clandestine meetings, held since Iran's reform-minded President Hassan Rouhani was inaugurated in August, produced much of the agreement later formally hammered out in negotiations in Geneva among the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China, Germany and Iran, said three senior administration officials. All spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss by name the highly sensitive diplomatic effort.
The AP was tipped to the first U.S.-Iranian meeting in March shortly after it occurred, but the White House and State Department disputed elements of the account and the AP could not confirm the meeting. The AP learned of further indications of secret diplomacy in the fall and pressed the White House and other officials further. As the Geneva talks appeared to be reaching their conclusion, senior administration officials confirmed to the AP the details of the extensive outreach.
The Geneva deal provides Iran with about $7 billion in relief from international sanctions in exchange for Iranian curbs on uranium enrichment and other nuclear activity. All parties pledged to work toward a final accord next year that would remove remaining suspicions in the West that Tehran is trying to assemble an atomic weapons arsenal.
Iran insists its nuclear interest is only in peaceful energy production and medical research. The diplomatic gamble with Iran, if the interim agreement holds up and leads to a final pact preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, could avert years of threats of U.S. or Israeli military intervention. It could also prove a turning point in decades of hostility between Washington and Tehran — and become a crowning foreign policy achievement of Obama's presidency.
But if the deal collapses, or if Iran covertly races ahead with development of a nuclear weapon, Obama will face the consequences of failure, both at home and abroad. His gamble opens him to criticism that he has left Israel vulnerable to a country bent on its destruction and that he has made a deal with a state sponsor of terrorism.
The U.S. and Iran cut off diplomatic ties in 1979 after the Islamic Revolution and the storming of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, where 52 Americans were held hostage for more than a year. But Obama has expressed a willingness since becoming president to meet with the Iranians without conditions.
At the president's direction, the United States began a tentative outreach shortly after his inauguration in January 2009. Obama and Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, exchanged letters, but the engagement yielded no results.
That outreach was hampered by Iran's hardline former president, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, whose re-election in a disputed vote in June of that year led to a violent crackdown on opposition protesters. The next month, relations seemed at another low when Iran detained three American hikers who had strayed across the Iranian border from Iraq.
Ironically, efforts to win the release of the hikers turned out to be instrumental in making the clandestine diplomacy possible. Oman's Sultan Qaboos was a key player, facilitating the eventual release of the hikers — the last two of whom returned to the United States in 2011 — and then offering himself as a mediator for a U.S.-Iran rapprochement. The secret informal discussions between mid-level officials in Washington and Tehran began.
Officials described those early contacts as exploratory discussions focused on the logistics of setting up higher-level talks. The discussions happened through numerous channels, officials said, including face-to-face talks at undisclosed locations. They included exchanges between then U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, now Obama's national security adviser, and Iran's envoy to the world body, the officials said. National Security Council aide Puneet Talwar was also involved, the officials said.
The talks took on added weight eight months ago, when Obama dispatched the deputy secretary of state Burns, the top aide Sullivan and five other officials to meet with their Iranian counterparts in the Omani capital of Muscat. Obama dispatched the group shortly after the six powers opened a new round of nuclear talks with Iran in Almaty, Kazakhstan, in late February.
At the time, those main nuclear negotiations were making little progress, and the Iranians had little interest in holding bilateral talks with the United States on the sidelines of the meeting out of fear that the discussions would become public, the U.S. officials said.
So, with the assistance of Sultan Qaboos, officials in both countries began quietly making plans to meet in Oman. Burns, Sullivan and a small team of U.S. technical experts arrived on a military plane in mid-March for the meeting with the Iranians.
The senior administration officials who spoke to the AP would not say who Burns and Sullivan met with but characterized the Iranian attendees as career diplomats, national security aides and experts on the nuclear issue who were likely to remain key players even after the country's elections this summer.
The goal on the American side, the U.S. officials said, was simply at that point to see if the U.S. and Iran could successfully arrange bilateral talks — a low bar that underscored the sour state of relations between the two nations.
Beyond nuclear issues, the officials said the U.S. team at the March Oman meeting also raised concerns about Iranian involvement in Syria, Tehran's threats to close the strategically important Strait of Hormuz and the status of Robert Levinson, a missing former FBI agent who the U.S. believes was abducted in Iran, as well as two other Americans detained in the country.
Hoping to keep the channel open, Secretary of State John Kerry then visited Oman in May on a trip ostensibly to push a military deal with the sultanate but secretly focused on maintaining that country's key mediation role, particularly after the Iranian election scheduled for the next month, the officials said.
Rouhani's election in June on a platform of easing sanctions crippling Iran's economy and stated willingness to engage with the West gave a new spark to the U.S. effort, the officials said. Two secret meetings were organized immediately after Rouhani took office in August, with the specific goal of advancing the stalled nuclear talks with world powers. Another pair of meetings took place in October.
Burns and Sullivan led the U.S. delegation at each of those sessions, and were joined at the final secret meeting by chief U.S. nuclear negotiator Wendy Sherman. The Iranian delegation was a mix of officials the Americans had met in March in Oman and others who were new to the talks, administration officials said. All of the Iranians were fluent English speakers.
U.S. officials said the meetings happened in multiple locations, but would not confirm the exact spots, saying they did not want to jeopardize their ability to use the same locations in the future. But at least some of the talks are believed to have taken place in Oman.
The private meetings coincided with a public easing of U.S.-Iranian discord. In early August, Obama sent Rouhani a letter congratulating him on his election. The Iranian leader's response was viewed positively by the White House, which quickly laid the groundwork for the additional secret talks. The U.S. officials said they were convinced that the outreach had the blessing of Ayatollah Khameni, but would not elaborate.
As negotiators continued to talk behind the scenes, public speculation swirled over a possible meeting between Obama and Rouhani on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly, which both attended in September in New York. Burns and Sullivan sought to arrange face-to-face talks, but the meeting never happened largely due to Iranian concerns, the officials said. Two days later, though, Obama and Rouhani spoke by phone — the first direct contact between a U.S. and Iranian leader in more than 30 years.
It was only after that Obama-Rouhani phone call that the U.S. began informing allies of the secret talks with Iran, the U.S. officials said. Obama handled the most sensitive conversation himself, briefing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a Sept. 30 meeting at the White House. He informed Netanyahu only about the two summer meetings, not the March talks, in keeping with the White House's promise only to tell allies about any discussions with Iran that were substantive.
The U.S. officials would not describe Netanyahu's reaction. But the next day, he delivered his General Assembly speech, blasting Rouhani as a "wolf in sheep's clothing" and warning the U.S. against mistaking a change in Iran's tone with an actual change in nuclear ambitions. The Israeli leader has subsequently denounced the potential nuclear agreement as the "deal of the century" for Iran.
After telling Netanyahu about the secret talks, the United States then briefed the other members of the six-nation negotiating team, the U.S. officials said. The last secret gatherings between the U.S. and Iran took place shortly after the General Assembly, according to the officials.
There, the deal finally reached by the parties on Sunday began to take its final shape. At this month's larger formal nuclear negotiations between world powers and Iran in Geneva, Burns and Sullivan showed up as well, but the State Department went to great lengths to conceal their involvement, leaving their names off of the official delegation list.
They were housed at a different hotel than the rest of the team, used back entrances to come and go from meeting venues and were whisked into negotiating sessions from service elevators or unused corridors only after photographers left.
Follow Bradley
Klapper at http://twitter.com/bklapperAP, Matthew Lee at
http://twitter.com/APDiploWriter, and Julie Pace at
http://twitter.com/jpaceDC
Israel Minister: Iran Deal Based On 'Deception'
From left, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, U.S. Secretary of State
John Kerry, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, Russia's Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, gather at the United
Nations Palais, Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013, in Geneva, Switzerland, during
the Iran nuclear talks. A deal has been reached between six world powers
and Iran that calls on Tehran to limit its nuclear activities in return
for sanctions relief, the French and Iranian foreign ministers said
early Sunday.
But officials acknowledged there was nothing they
could do to stop the agreement, and said that Israel would do everything
it could to shape the final deal that is to be negotiated during the
next six months.
Israel believes Iran is trying to develop a nuclear weapon, and in the weeks leading up to Sunday's agreement, had warned the emerging deal was insufficient. It had called for increased pressure on Iran, and warned that any relief from economic sanctions would make Iran less willing to compromise down the road.
Israel's Cabinet minister for intelligence issues, Yuval Steinitz, said the last-minute changes to the deal were "far from satisfactory" and did nothing to change Israel's position. "This agreement is still bad and will make it more difficult than before to achieve an appropriate solution in the future," he said. Instead, he compared it to a failed 2007 international deal with North Korea and said it "is more likely to bring Iran closer to having a bomb."
"Israel cannot participate in the international celebration, which is based on Iranian deception and (international) self-delusion," said Steinitz, whose responsibilities include monitoring Iran's nuclear program.
The exact details of Sunday's deal, hammered out in Geneva between six world powers and Iran, were not immediately known. Israel was not a participant in the talks but remained in close touch with the U.S. and other allies during the negotiations.
In a statement, the White House called the nuclear agreement an "initial, six-month step." It said the deal limits Iran's existing stockpiles of enriched uranium, a key ingredient in making a nuclear bomb. It said the accord also curbs the number and capabilities of the centrifuges used to enrich and would limit Iran's ability to produce "weapons-grade plutonium" from a reactor in the advanced stages of construction. It also said there would be "intrusive monitoring" of Iran's nuclear program.
The statement also played down the extent of the relief from international sanctions, noting the "key oil, banking and financial sanctions architecture remains in place." It said any relief would be revoked if Iran did not keep its commitments.
Israel had called for far tougher measures, saying that stockpiles of enriched uranium should be removed from the country, all enrichment activity be halted and that the plutonium-producing facility be dismantled.
There was no immediate response from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had spent the past two weeks furiously lobbying against the deal. But an official in his office called Sunday's deal a "bad agreement."
"It grants Iran exactly what it wanted, a significant easing of sanctions while preserving the most significant parts of its nuclear program," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity pending a formal statement from Netanyahu. The prime minister was expected to address his Cabinet later Sunday.
Israel considers a nuclear-armed Iran a threat to its very survival, citing Iranian calls for Israel's destruction, its development of long-range missiles capable of striking Israel and Iran's support for hostile militant groups along Israel's borders. It dismisses Iranian claims that the nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
Israel has repeatedly threatened to carry out a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities if it concludes international diplomacy has failed to curb the Iranian nuclear program. But Israeli officials all but acknowledged that an Israeli attack is not in the works, and that the focus would now turn to influencing the final deal.
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told Israel Radio that the deal ushers in a "new reality" in the Middle East and predicted it sparking a nuclear arms race in the region. "Those that support this agreement only say one good thing about it, and that's that we win time en route to a final agreement," Deputy Foreign Minister Zeev Elkin told Channel 2 TV. "Our main activity is now directed at a very clear destination — what will be in the final agreement."
Deputy Israeli Defense Minister Danny Danon, a senior member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud Party, indicated a military strike is still an option. "It goes without saying that all options remain on the table and that Israel has the capability — and the responsibility — to defend itself using any means necessary," he said.
JERUSALEM, ISRAEL (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — Israel on Sunday harshly criticized
the international community's nuclear deal with Iran, accusing the world
of "self-delusion" and saying the first-stage agreement would not halt
what it says is Tehran's pursuit of nuclear weapons capability.
Israel believes Iran is trying to develop a nuclear weapon, and in the weeks leading up to Sunday's agreement, had warned the emerging deal was insufficient. It had called for increased pressure on Iran, and warned that any relief from economic sanctions would make Iran less willing to compromise down the road.
Israel's Cabinet minister for intelligence issues, Yuval Steinitz, said the last-minute changes to the deal were "far from satisfactory" and did nothing to change Israel's position. "This agreement is still bad and will make it more difficult than before to achieve an appropriate solution in the future," he said. Instead, he compared it to a failed 2007 international deal with North Korea and said it "is more likely to bring Iran closer to having a bomb."
"Israel cannot participate in the international celebration, which is based on Iranian deception and (international) self-delusion," said Steinitz, whose responsibilities include monitoring Iran's nuclear program.
The exact details of Sunday's deal, hammered out in Geneva between six world powers and Iran, were not immediately known. Israel was not a participant in the talks but remained in close touch with the U.S. and other allies during the negotiations.
In a statement, the White House called the nuclear agreement an "initial, six-month step." It said the deal limits Iran's existing stockpiles of enriched uranium, a key ingredient in making a nuclear bomb. It said the accord also curbs the number and capabilities of the centrifuges used to enrich and would limit Iran's ability to produce "weapons-grade plutonium" from a reactor in the advanced stages of construction. It also said there would be "intrusive monitoring" of Iran's nuclear program.
The statement also played down the extent of the relief from international sanctions, noting the "key oil, banking and financial sanctions architecture remains in place." It said any relief would be revoked if Iran did not keep its commitments.
Israel had called for far tougher measures, saying that stockpiles of enriched uranium should be removed from the country, all enrichment activity be halted and that the plutonium-producing facility be dismantled.
There was no immediate response from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had spent the past two weeks furiously lobbying against the deal. But an official in his office called Sunday's deal a "bad agreement."
"It grants Iran exactly what it wanted, a significant easing of sanctions while preserving the most significant parts of its nuclear program," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity pending a formal statement from Netanyahu. The prime minister was expected to address his Cabinet later Sunday.
Israel considers a nuclear-armed Iran a threat to its very survival, citing Iranian calls for Israel's destruction, its development of long-range missiles capable of striking Israel and Iran's support for hostile militant groups along Israel's borders. It dismisses Iranian claims that the nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
Israel has repeatedly threatened to carry out a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities if it concludes international diplomacy has failed to curb the Iranian nuclear program. But Israeli officials all but acknowledged that an Israeli attack is not in the works, and that the focus would now turn to influencing the final deal.
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told Israel Radio that the deal ushers in a "new reality" in the Middle East and predicted it sparking a nuclear arms race in the region. "Those that support this agreement only say one good thing about it, and that's that we win time en route to a final agreement," Deputy Foreign Minister Zeev Elkin told Channel 2 TV. "Our main activity is now directed at a very clear destination — what will be in the final agreement."
Deputy Israeli Defense Minister Danny Danon, a senior member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud Party, indicated a military strike is still an option. "It goes without saying that all options remain on the table and that Israel has the capability — and the responsibility — to defend itself using any means necessary," he said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Gambia’s Hidden History: How A Tiny River Basin Influenced Colonial Trade And Slavery
A mural at a slave house on Janjanbureh Island, once known as Georgetown, in The Gambia. Peter van der Sluijs/Wikimedia Commons BY PAPA CHER...
-
This cover image released by Knopf shows "Lincoln’s Peace: The Struggle to End the American Civil War" by Michael Vorenberg. (Kn...
-
Sarah Wynn-Williams. Photograph: Sarah Wynn-Williams BY STUART JEFFRIES Shortly after her waters broke, Sarah Wynn-Williams was lying in hos...










