Showing posts with label Campaign Diary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Campaign Diary. Show all posts

Sunday, March 10, 2024

The Diaries Of Presidents Offer History In The Raw — Even The Naked — And May Have Secrets To Tell

A portion of a page from a Harry Truman’s 1947 presidential diary is shown at the National Archives in Washington, July 10, 2003. Presidents from George Washington to Joe Biden have kept presidential diaries. In them, they confide in themselves, express raw opinions, trace even the humdrum habits of their day and offer insight-on-the-fly on monumental decisions of their time. It’s where they may also spill secrets they shouldn’t. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

BY CALVIN WOODWARD

WASHINGTON (AP)
— Just before dawn one summer day in Washington, the president of the United States stripped naked on a rock by the river, plunged in and saw a dead man float to the surface.

We know this about John Quincy Adams because he kept a diary for the ages. So have many presidents, from George Washington to Joe Biden. In these journals — a collection of notebooks in Biden’s case — they confide to themselves, express raw opinions, trace even the humdrum habits of their day and offer seat-of-the-pants insight on monumental decisions of their time.

Here, also, they may possess and spill secrets they shouldn’t. That’s part of why Biden is facing more congressional scrutiny this week for his sloppy handling of classified documents after his vice presidency. Meantime Donald Trump became the first person in history to be charged with a crime for making off with sensitive government records as president — and then, unlike Biden, resisting demands to return them.

Adams called his diary his “second conscience” — not to mention a place to record his frequent skinny-dipping in the Potomac — and presidents since have vouched for the value of scribbling down the day’s observations or dictating them to a recorder to help them think things through and preserve them in memory, if not memoirs.

“The process of converting a jumble of thoughts into coherent sentences makes you ask tougher questions,” Barack Obama said of his journaling.

Jimmy Carter, who came away from the White House with more than 5,000 pages of transcribed entries, allowed, “I seldom exercised any restraint on what I dictated.”

Dwight Eisenhower wrote in a diary entry not only about infighting on a scientific advisory panel, but its highly secret (if questionable) analysis that Soviet atomic bombs could be rendered 99% ineffective by surrounding them with a type of radioactivity to which they were uniquely vulnerable.

Trump’s diary was named Twitter.

Now Robert Hur, the special counsel who probed Biden’s treatment of classified material but declined to recommend charges, is to appear before a House committee Tuesday to explain findings that left both parties ambivalent, for opposite reasons.

Democrats are relieved Biden won’t be charged but upset that Hur cited old-age memory fog as one reason the president should get a pass. Republicans wanted Biden prosecuted yet were delighted to see Hur fuel the public’s sense that Biden is too old for the job.

The hearing is bound to touch on the ample history of presidents who left office with documents containing state secrets, even after the 1978 Presidential Records Act mandated that the government has “complete ownership, possession, and control” of all presidential and vice presidential records. The act was just one part of a reformist clean-up of government from Richard Nixon’s corrupt presidency.

A president’s diary is exempt from that act, at least when its content does not relate to the conduct of official business, but classified information is not supposed to be there.

According to Hur’s report, Biden’s diaries contained highly classified reflections on foreign adversaries, homeland threats and notes from the President’s Daily Brief, including some determined to be “top secret” with markings signifying they came from human intelligence sources — among the most closely controlled secrets in the U.S. government.

He appeared to keep multiple sets of notes, one organized for his daily reflections and another devoted to foreign policy. The papers gather information explaining why he disapproved of President Obama’s plan for a U.S. troop surge in Afghanistan.

“There is evidence that, after his vice presidency, Mr. Biden willfully retained marked classified documents about Afghanistan and unmarked classified handwritten notes in his notebooks, both of which he stored in unsecured places in his home,” Hur wrote.

“He had no legal authority to do so,” Hur went on, and the president’s actions “risked serious damage to America’s national security.” But he said the evidence falls far short of proving that Mr. Biden retained and disclosed these classified materials willfully.

The special counsel investigation drew a sharp contrast between Biden and Trump, crediting the Democrat with fully cooperating in the return of documents he shouldn’t have had, consenting to searches in several places and submitting to an interview that lasted more than five hours.

“After being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution, Mr. Trump allegedly did the opposite,” Hur said. “According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.”

Presidents who have been less conspicuous in disdaining the rules have not faced such trouble.

Ronald Reagan, Hur noted in his report, left the White House in 1989 with eight years of handwritten diaries, “which he appears to have kept at his California home even though they contained Top Secret information.” The Justice Department took no known steps to retrieve or secure the diaries.

Carter dictated entries to his diary and had them typed by a secretary. Returning to Plains, Georgia, after his presidency, Carter realized he had 21 large volumes of double-spaced text, excerpts of which became a book.

Hur said there is “some reason to think” Carter and another enthusiastic diarist, George H.W. Bush, both had classified information in their diaries. But that was hardly shocking.

“Historically, after leaving office, many former presidents and vice presidents have knowingly taken home sensitive materials related to national security from their administrations without being charged with crimes,” Hur wrote.

Students of history have always placed great stock in the unguarded musings of high officials, whether in a diary, a leaked conversation or one of the thousands of White House recordings that six presidents secretly taped from the Franklin Roosevelt administration to the downfall of Nixon.

Those episodes are rarer in the scripted, polished and controlled enterprise of the modern American presidency, under any recent president not named Trump.

They “provide unique windows into the presidency, helping us better understand how policy is made and power is used,” said Marc Selverstone, director of Presidential Studies and co-chair of the Presidential Recordings Program at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. “You get it, as LBJ would have said, with the bark off.”

To be sure, there wasn’t much guarded about John Quincy Adams, judging by the 15,000 pages of diary entries he wrote over more than 68 years, four of them in the White House. His diaries “comprise the longest continuous record of any American of the time,” says the Massachusetts Historical Society, which publishes them online.

On May 26, 1828, Adams closed a long, detailed post about his “harassing day (of) crowded and multifarious business” with happy news from his garden. “I perceived a tamarind heaving up the earth,” he wrote, and he planted Hautboy Strawberries.

Another day, he enjoyed “sitting naked, basking on the bank at the margin of the river” after a swim. No secrets there.

On July 22, 1825, his early morning routine of walking and swimming took a dark twist.

“I walked as usual to my ordinary bathing place, and came to the rock where I leave my clothes a few minutes before sunrise — I found several persons there, besides three or four who were bathing; and at the shore under the tree a boat with four men in it, and a drag net ... in search of a dead body.”

“I stripped and went in to the river; I had been not more than ten minutes swimming when the drag boat started, and they were not five minutes from the shore when the body floated immediately opposite the rock; less than one hundred yards from the shore.”

Thus the diary of the sixth president notes the death of Mr. Shoemaker, a post office clerk seen swimming about in the water until he was gone.

AP White House Correspondent Zeke Miller in Wilmington, Delaware, contributed to this report.

Sunday, May 05, 2019

Biden: Trump, Republicans Allowing Jim Crow To Return

Former Vice President Joe Biden takes photos with supporters following the first rally of his 2020 campaign, Saturday, May 4, 2019 in Columbia, S.C. (AP Photo/Meg Kinnard)

BY MEG KINNARD; BILL BARROW

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP)
— Former Vice President Joe Biden charged Saturday that Jim Crow is “sneaking back in” as he emphasized voting rights at his first presidential campaign stop in South Carolina, where black voters play a key role in the South’s first presidential primary.

In criticizing Republican efforts to adopt more stringent voting rules, including identification requirements and curtailing early voting hours, Biden recalled the racial segregation laws of the past.

“You’ve got Jim Crow sneaking back in,” he said, referring to the era before the civil rights movement. “You know what happens when you have an equal right to vote? They lose.”


Biden centered much of his trip around the need to restore decency to the White House. “Your state motto is, ‘While I breathe, I hope,’” he said at the rally after continuing his full-throated denunciation of President Donald Trump. “It’s not a joke. We’re breathing, but God, we have got to have hope.”

He kept up that theme at a private evening fundraiser, telling several dozen donors that he expects a nasty race from President Donald Trump.

“This guy is going to go after me and family,” Biden said, recalling his grandchildren telling him before his announcement that they expect Trump and others to bring up family details including his son Hunter Biden’s divorce.

Biden said there “are so many nicknames I want to give this guy,” and he drew laughter when he joked that he’d “start with clown.” But he added that he doesn’t want to respond in kind.

“The only place he has any confidence is in the mud,” Biden said, because the president “doesn’t understand how to respond to issues.”

Biden said he will answer Trump “directly” in the future without name-calling. He recalled saying in 2016 that in high school he’d have “taken him behind the barn and beat the hell out of” Trump. “Guess what? I probably shouldn’t have done that,” Biden said. “The presidency is an office that requires dignity and reestablishing respect and standing.”

Biden will continue his trip Sunday by worshipping at a black church in Columbia.

He opened his latest run for president with explicit appeals to white, working-class voters across the Midwest, pledging his support for unions and promising to rebuild the middle class. Now, Biden is trying to gauge whether his message will resonate among more diverse electorates. Black voters accounted for a solid majority of Democratic presidential primary ballots in 2016.

Ahead of her husband’s afternoon remarks, Jill Biden emphasized the couple’s long ties to South Carolina, saying they came to the state to grieve after their son Beau died of cancer in 2015.

“Joe and I love South Carolina,” she said.

The former vice president credited the late South Carolina Sen. Fritz Hollings with persuading him not to abandon public office after Biden’s first wife and daughter were killed in an auto accident weeks after his election to the Senate in 1972. Last month, Biden traveled to Charleston to eulogize his longtime desk mate and friend .

He also noted his long friendship with Rep. Jim Clyburn, one of the top-ranking House Democrats. Clyburn, who typically doesn’t endorse a candidate before the South Carolina presidential primary, didn’t attend Biden’s events.

Elsewhere in campaigning Saturday by Democratic presidential candidates:

BERNIE SANDERS

Sen. Bernie Sanders said one area in which he doesn’t fault President Donald Trump is his handling of North Korea, telling ABC’s “This Week” that Trump’s face-to-face meeting with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un “is the right thing to do.”

Sanders called North Korea “a threat to the planet” and said the U.S. has to do everything possible to have China and others in the region put pressure on the North and “make it clear that they cannot continue to act this way.”

South Korean officials said North Korea fired several unidentified short-range projectiles into the sea off its eastern coast on Saturday. The launch came amid a diplomatic breakdown between the U.S. and the North.

“This Week” released quotes from the interview in Iowa ahead of its broadcast Sunday.

Sanders told reporters in Iowa that if he were in the House, he would hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt for his refusal to appear at a congressional hearing on the special counsel’s Russia investigation and its report.

“We have a separation of powers, we don’t have an authoritarian government,” Sanders said.

AMY KLOBUCHAR

Sen. Amy Klobuchar is knocking Trump as being too soft on Russian President Vladimir Putin during their recent phone call.

Trump and Putin on Friday had their first known call since the release of the special counsel’s report on Russian election meddling, and Trump said he didn’t warn the Russian president against interfering in future elections.

Klobuchar told reporters after an event in Des Moines, Iowa, that her message would be very different.

“What I would say when I’m president to Vladimir Putin is that we’ve got your number, I’ve got the FBI after you, I’ve got the CIA looking at all of this, I’ve figured out what you guys are up to and we’re going to protect our elections and we’re going to put increasing sanctions on against you.”

Klobuchar also said she was frustrated that congressional investigators haven’t been able to question special counsel Robert Mueller, whom she described as “the witness we need to go after Russia so that they don’t attack our elections again.”

SETH MOULTON

Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts is calling for more funding for the State Department.

Moulton said his own experience serving as a Marine in the Middle East showed the importance of diplomacy.

“When the State Department goes in first to these conflicts they prevent having to send American troops. So the more money that we invest in the State Department, it doesn’t just save ammunition. It saves American lives.”

BETO O’ROURKE

Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke said in a commencement address that the legacies of “slavery, of segregation, of Jim Crow, of suppression” are “alive and well” today.

In remarks at historically black Paul Quinn College in Dallas, O’Rourke said “the work is far from over.” He has previously expressed support for creating a commission to study economic reparations for black Americans.

ELIZABETH WARREN

Sen. Elizabeth Warren warned the nation remains “at risk” for further foreign interference in its elections and that Trump “puts us squarely in trouble” with his public warmth toward Putin.

The Massachusetts Democrat told reporters in Iowa that the special counsel’s report “demonstrated conclusively that Russia attacked our electoral system with the purpose of helping Donald Trump.”

She said Trump then “turns around two weeks later and says, ‘We’re all good on this’? We’re not all good on this.”

Trump tweeted on Saturday that his call with Putin the previous day was a sign of “tremendous potential for a good/great relationship with Russia.”

Warren also criticized Trump for maintaining his alignment with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un even after Pyongyang launched short-range projectiles off its coast.

“Trump is just all over the map,” Warren told reporters. “Foreign policy by tweet doesn’t work.”

Associated Press Alexandra Jaffe in Des Moines, Iowa; Elana Schor in Osage, Iowa; Will Weissert in Dallas; and Hunter Woodall in Salem, New Hampshire, contributed to this report.

Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP

Wednesday, April 03, 2019

Biden Says He’ll Adjust His Physical Behavior As Three More Women Come Forward

© Courtesy of Sofie Karasek/Courtesy of Sofie Karasek Then-Vice President Biden talks wth Sofie Karasek after the 2016 Academy Awards ceremony. Karasek was among sexual assault victims who appeared onstage with Lady Gaga that year. Biden’s physical contact came after Karasek told him of a college student who had been sexually assaulted and recently died by suicide. She later said the physical encounter had made her feel uncomfortable.

By Elise Viebeck, Matt Viser, Colby Itkowitz
The Washington Post
Former vice president Joe Biden promised on Wednesday to adjust his physical behavior toward women, an effort to quell controversy over whether his intimate style is appropriate in the era of the #MeToo movement.

Biden addressed critics in a video posted to Twitter as three additional women told The Washington Post on Wednesday about encounters with him that made them feel uncomfortable. Their stories bring the total number of people who have expressed concerns about alleged interactions with Biden to seven. Other women defended Biden, who has been seen by many women as an advocate for them.

The new accounts, emerging just weeks before Biden, 76, is expected to announce his decision about a White House bid, reflected a feeling among some women that Biden was struggling to understand why his behavior might at times be inappropriate or unwelcome. In a party energized by millennials, women and people of color, Biden has faced criticism over a host of positions and decisions from his nearly five decades in public life, including his handling of Anita Hill’s testimony during Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s confirmation hearing.

Even on Wednesday, as Biden acknowledged shifting social norms and promised to be “more respectful of people’s personal space,” he defended his style of interacting and did not offer an apology.

“I’ll be much more mindful. That is my responsibility, my responsibility, and I’ll meet it. But I’ll always believe governing, quite frankly, and life, for that matter, is about connecting, about connecting with people. That won’t change,” Biden said in the video.

Three women told The Post that Biden’s behavior toward them made them feel uncomfortable and said Biden’s comments Wednesday didn’t fully address their concerns.

Vail Kohnert-Yount said she was a White House intern in the spring of 2013 and one day tried to exit the basement of the West Wing when she was asked to step aside so Biden could enter. After she moved out of the way, she said, Biden approached her to introduce himself and shake her hand.

“He then put his hand on the back of my head and pressed his forehead to my forehead while he talked to me. I was so shocked that it was hard to focus on what he was saying. I remember he told me I was a ‘pretty girl,’ ” Kohnert-Yount said in a statement to The Post.

She described feeling uncomfortable and embarrassed that Biden had commented on her appearance in a professional setting, “even though it was intended as a compliment.”

“I do not consider my experience to have been sexual assault or harassment,” she stated, adding that she believes Biden’s intentions were good. “But it was the kind of inappropriate behavior that makes many women feel uncomfortable and unequal in the workplace.”

In response to Biden’s video, Kohnert-Yount emailed: “I appreciate his attempt to do better in the future, but to me this is not mainly about whether Joe Biden has adequate respect for personal space. It’s about women deserving equal respect in the workplace.”

The allegations have dominated coverage of Biden since last week. President Trump, who has denied multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, on Wednesday said Biden should not apologize for his behavior, even as a pro-Trump super PAC circulated an online ad casting Biden’s interactions with women and girls in a negative light.

Biden’s video comes as he and his advisers have been laying the groundwork for a presidential campaign. He has been expected to make an announcement by late April, and in recent days his advisers have been calling allies to assure them that the latest controversy would not knock him out of a run. Advisers said that they viewed Biden’s video as a strong and forceful response and that it has not derailed his decision.

The reexamination of Biden’s behavior toward women began last week after a former Nevada legislator, Lucy Flores, wrote that she felt uncomfortable after Biden allegedly held her shoulders, smelled her hair and kissed her head in 2014.

In the wake of the allegations, multiple women came forward to defend Biden, including former staffers, MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski and actress and #MeToo advocate Alyssa Milano. Several noted Biden’s record on issues concerning women; as a senator from Delaware, he led efforts to pass the Violence Against Women Act, and as vice president, he was the Obama administration’s point person on efforts to end sexual assaults against women on college campuses.

The Democratic mayor of Atlanta, Keisha Lance Bottoms, on Wednesday evening tweeted a photo of she and Biden standing forehead to forehead.

“Everyone’s experience is their own. As for mine, I found my introduction and interaction with @JoeBiden to be genuine and endearing,” she wrote.

Six other women have shared stories similar to Flores’s. D.J. Hill and Caitlyn Caruso, who told the New York Times on Tuesday that Biden had made them feel uncomfortable during encounters with him, did not respond to requests for comment.

A spokesman for Biden declined to comment on any specific allegations and referred The Post to the video posted to Twitter earlier in the day.

The most recent encounter described to The Post took place in 2016.

Sofie Karasek was part of a group of 51 sexual assault victims who appeared onstage at the Oscars with Lady Gaga that year; Biden had introduced the singer’s performance.

Karasek said as she met Biden after the ceremony, she was thinking about a college student who had been sexually assaulted and recently died by suicide. She decided to share the story with the then-vice president, and Biden responded by clasping her hands and leaning down to place his forehead against hers, a moment captured in a widely circulated photograph.

Karasek said she appreciated Biden’s support but also felt awkward and uncomfortable that his gesture had left their faces suddenly inches apart. She said she did not know how to respond to, as she described it, Biden crossing the boundary into her personal space at a sensitive moment.

Someone printed her the photo of that moment, which Karasek framed and put on a shelf, but later took it down as the #MeToo movement began drawing more attention to cases of sexual harassment, assault and unwanted touching.

She said Biden, in the video, “still didn’t take ownership in the way that he needs to.”

“He emphasized that he wants to connect with people and, of course, that’s important. But again, all of our interactions and friendships are a two-way street. . . . Too often it doesn’t matter how the woman feels about it or they just assume that they’re fine with it,” she said.

The third woman to speak with The Post recalled meeting Biden for the first time during the 2008 election cycle.

Ally Coll said she was a young Democratic staffer helping run a reception of about 50 people when Biden entered the room. She said she was then introduced to Biden, who she said leaned in, squeezed her shoulders and delivered a compliment about her smile, holding her “for a beat too long.”

Coll, who runs the Purple Campaign, a nonprofit group that fights sexual harassment, said she felt nervous and excited about meeting Biden at the time and shrugged off feelings of discomfort. She says now that she felt his alleged behavior was out of place and inappropriate in the context of a work situation.

“There’s been a lack of understanding about the way that power can turn something that might seem innocuous into something that can make somebody feel uncomfortable,” said Coll, who consults with companies about their workplace policies.

Coll said Biden’s video demonstrated “a continued lack of understanding about why these stories are being told and their relevance in the #MeToo era.”

People who have observed or interacted with Biden said pulling people toward him to touch foreheads is a common gesture he employs with men and women.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the country’s highest ranking Democrat and female political leader, said this week that the allegations against Biden are not disqualifying but that he should learn to avoid such intimate physical behavior in political settings.

“I think that it’s important for the vice president and others to understand that it isn’t what you intended; it’s how it was received,” Pelosi said at Tuesday morning at an event in Washington.

The speaker also challenged Biden’s response to the controversy on Sunday, when he stated that he never intended to act inappropriately but “if it is suggested I did so, I will listen respectfully.”

“To say, ‘I’m sorry that you were offended’ is not an apology,” Pelosi said. “That’s not accepting the fact that people think differently about communication, whether it’s a handshake, a hug. . . . He has to understand in the world that we’re in now that people’s space is important to them, and what’s important is how they receive it, not necessarily how you intended it.”

elise.viebeck@washpost.com

matt.viser@washpost.com

colby.itkowitz@washpost.com

Felicia Sonmez contributed to this report.

Tuesday, October 03, 2017

Kennedy Is Key To Supreme Court Outcome On Partisan Maps

Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger speaks at a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2017. The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case about political maps in Wisconsin that could affect elections across the country.

WASHINGTON (ASSOCIATED PRESS) — In a case that could reshape American politics, the Supreme Court appeared split Tuesday on whether Wisconsin Republicans gave themselves an unfair advantage when they drew political maps to last a decade.

If Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vote almost certainly controls the outcome, is prepared to join his liberal colleagues, the court could rule for the first time that districting plans that entrench one party's control of a legislature or congressional delegation can violate the constitutional rights of the other party's voters. That could lead to changes in political maps across the country.

While both parties seek maximum partisan advantage when they can, Republicans controlled more state governments after the 2010 census and aggressively used redistricting to lock in electoral advantages to last for the next 10 years.

Kennedy suggested, as he did in another redistricting case 13 years ago, that courts perhaps could be involved in placing limits on extremely partisan electoral maps. But he did not tip his hand about whether the Wisconsin map that favors Republicans crossed a constitutional line.

Throughout the session, the justices and lawyers alike appeared to cast their questions and remarks with the hope of attracting Kennedy. He wrote in 2004 that he would be open to ruling for the challengers if the court could be shown a good way to measure and manage excessively partisan districts.

Paul Smith, the same lawyer who failed to get Kennedy's vote and thus a majority 13 years ago, said technology and data analysis had so improved since then that there are good ways to measure when one party gives itself an unfair edge in creating districts.

Without the court's intervention, Smith said on behalf of the Democratic voters, the next round of redistricting after the 2020 census will see far more extreme partisan maps. "You are the only institution in the United States that can solve this problem just as democracy is about to get worse," Smith said.

"You paint a very dire picture," Justice Samuel Alito replied dryly. He seemed unpersuaded. The conservative justices were skeptical about striking down the state's map or even involving courts in the inherently political process of redistricting.

Chief Justice John Roberts worried about involving the Supreme Court in a glut of partisan redistricting claims that would follow if the Wisconsin Democrats prevail. "We'll have to decide in every case whether the Democrats win or the Republicans win," Roberts said, a scenario that he said would damage the court's credibility.

The liberal justices appeared to favor the Democratic voters who challenged the Wisconsin plan. Republicans who controlled the legislature and the governor's office adopted electoral maps that have given themselves a significant advantage in the state Assembly in a state that is otherwise roughly divided between the parties.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that a decision upholding the Republican-drawn districts in Wisconsin would encourage one party's lawmakers to stack the deck against their opponents when they control the process and reduce the number of legitimately contested elections.

"What becomes of the precious right to vote?" she asked. Representing Wisconsin, Misha Tseytlin urged the court not to succumb to the other side's "scare tactics about what will happen next." People waited in line for hours for a chance to view the argument on the second day of the court's term. Roberts turned down a request for live audio of the argument.

The packed house included former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, among a handful of prominent Republicans who want the court to rein in partisan redistricting. The Supreme Court has never thrown out a political map because it is too partisan. Courts have struck down districts as racially biased for decades, and other partisan districting lawsuits are moving through the courts in Maryland and North Carolina.

In Wisconsin, a lower court sifted through evidence showing that Republicans packed Democrats into some districts and spread them out across others to maximize gains for the GOP. In one analysis, Democrats captured far fewer state Assembly seats even when they won roughly the same percentage of the statewide vote as Republicans.

The lower court concluded that the districting plans were drawn to discriminate against Democrats, the Republicans' advantage would endure even in the face of a strong Democratic showing at the polls and the plans could not be explained by other, non-partisan reasons.

The state is arguing the justices should put an end to courts' consideration of partisanship in districting plans and cautioning that far from being manageable, a ruling for the Democratic voters would open the door to a flood of lawsuits that would be based on cherry-picked evidence and hard for judges to manage.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, the newest member of the court, likened the court's task in finding a way to measure partisanship with his preparations for grilling steak. "I like my turmeric and other spices, but I'm not going to tell you how much. What's this court supposed to do, a pinch of this, a pinch of that?" Gorsuch asked.

A decision in Gill v. Whitford, 16-1161, is expected by spring.

This story has been corrected to show the case number is 16-1161.

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

A Barack Obama Campaign Diary




“Yo, What u think about da Obama guy, man!?” I’m getting pissed with the crazy ass white folks, they ain't mean well, brotha!

“Hey, that hardball politics ain’t gonna fly, man!” “You feel me?”

“I feel you, dawg!”

“Obama ain’t black. He ain’t got no clue what been happening in the hood, man.”

“I hear you my brother. I ain’t voting for nobody. Nothing’s gonna change, man! You feel me?

“I feel you dawg!”

Another voice would pop up and say, “Hey, man, you listening to the damn liars? They ain’t nothing but liars, man. They ain’t got nothing for you, and you better quit dreaming, man! You feel me, though?”

“I feel you dawg!!”

“Ammo take it like it is man. I’m a hustler hommie and I don’t give a damn about what u guys say. Ammo hustle man to keep food on the table. Ammo do anything to survive, man. I’m a soldier, man. I got five little kids, hommie. Ammo hustle and buy dem bad ass rims, hommie. Dem lying politicians ain’t gonna buy toys and clothes for my kids, man. ‘Am a hustler hommie and ammo keep it straight. Ammo keep it straight, man! You feel me?”

“You da man!! You da man!! You da man, and I feel you dawg!!!”

“Hey, you guys ain’t real, man. Obama is the man and he is giving us hope that one day we shall overcome our predicaments. You see what I’m saying? And that’s for real man. Obama ain’t no educated fool. He got game and he is for real, my brother!”

“I hear you dawg, Obama is the man; he's the man!”

“Come on, man, you guys just don’t get it. Ammo tell you why. Obama ain’t black and he ain’t white either and you guys better quit playing the race card. He ain’t got nothing against anybody. Brother just wants the damn crooked politicians to get out of the way so America can be a better place for us all. Obama is the man and he got my vote. You feel me, man?”

“I feel you dawg, but hey, he ain't gonna watch your back!”

“You guys been tripping. What’s all the fuss about da Obama ain’t black or white? Ammo tell you guys something. I need money. I need a job. I need to hang out in the hood and do my thang. I need to cruise in my Chevy Impala low-rider with dem tight chicks on Crenshaw and no damn cop chasing me cuz I’m black. I wanna be free, man. You feel me?”

“I feel you dawg, but Obama ain't coming to Crenshaw, you know that!”

“Ok, let’s be real guys. Ammo go out there and vote for Obama. I don’t care what you guys say cuz I know Obama is for real man. I know and you know Obama gonna change America. And If I vote and you vote we know he’s gonna win and that’s all we need my brother. You feel me, man?”

“I feel you dawg!”

“Okay, guys, why don’t we agree on one thing. The Clintons and the Bushes been running this country for a while and ain’t nothing happening but lying to the people, man. They been fighting and throwing bombs here and there making America look bad, man. They been throwing bombs all over, man. They been killing my brothers in Africa, man. They been taking all our treasures, man. These white folks are bad, man. Let’s give the black man a chance and you see what’s gonna happen. You feel me?”

“I feel you dawg, but brothas are worst than white folks!”

“Look man, I don’t know what you guys been talking about. Ammo stick to the dude about dem tight gals and low-rider on Crenshaw, man! Dem cops been chasing us around cuz we been driving while black. You see what I’m saying? For real man, they been all over us cuz a brother been making some little change, hustling, man, hanging out in the hood with dem hoes. I got to hustle to help my baby mama put food on the table, man! I don’t care about no damn politician. He ain’t gonna put food on the table, man!! You feel me?”

“I feel you dawg!!!”

That’s the story of the regular guy on the street who is getting by on a daily basis doing the best out of a very bad situation which is typical with the “hood rats” in the projects and South Central Los Angeles. Some of them with records beyond imagination and they wonder how change is about to come, all of a sudden, with a black president who was raised under humble circumstances and had no clue what’s been going on in the projects with majority of these kids not knowing who “their daddy is.” They wonder how a polarized system can change all that.

It is a  case of sad reality when one thinks about it. The 18th Street Gang. The 48th Street Crips. The East Los Angeles Gang stretching from Boyle Heights to Alhambra, the Gangs of South Central Los Angeles, Watts, Compton, Long Beach, Lynwood, Hawthorne and the Crenshaw District are areas of political interest now that “change” has become the keyword in this fascinating campaign. What kids in these gang infested neighborhoods are calling for is a profound leadership that would give them a sense of purpose, to rise above the limitations imposed on them for a better future. And the Obama campaign team should put this into perspective and make it a priority with regards to “change” and “yes we can.”

Though Obama is talking about change, and perhaps, it’s about to happen, that is, if he gets the mandate in a polarized American culture. I’m not sure if he has taken that into perspective throughout his campaign that seemingly would change America for good and California in particular, dating back to the Gold Rush when aggressive slave power was the subject matter and when a financial oligarchic class took laws into their own hands.

The fears expressed by these young kids in the ghetto, and programmed projects as in welfare state would definitely not change anything considering the fact that these underprivileged kids have been programmed through all sorts of government regulated social programs to have limited abilities to unshackle themselves from the bondage that is coupled with a government which has persistently maintained the status quo, with limitations imposed in the hoods, and associated with widespread crime waves that has no end in sight.

Don’t get me wrong. I love Obama and I want him to be the next president of the United States with no color lines but for the fact American is desperately in need of change and the time should be now in order to get rid of a very deceptive and corrupt administration typical of Ulysses Grant, Warren G. Harding administrations, respectively. The George W. Bush administration has destroyed America, in its entirety, and nobody is really sure how long a new democratic administration, be it Clinton or Obama, would administer in putting America back on track in terms of its economy and its relationship with the Western World and other relative global leaders.

And we hope if Obama wins, a new age of prosperity and the “era of good feelings” would resurface which is why Obama should be given the chance on the ground he was raised a common man knowing in detail what it means surviving the odds. He had gone through Occidental College in Los Angeles, Columbia University in New York and Harvard University in Cambridge, all in quest for a “common purpose” Americans like him needed. Are the “hood rats” listening? I hope so!! Are they? I hope so, I hope so!! I definitely hope so!!!

Just at the end of 43rd Place and Degnan Boulevard that stretches down from series of black businesses at Leimert Park in Black Township, if you are a tourist or just poking around, you will notice one thing typical as the political campaigns heats up with Barack Obama posters here and there hyping up the idea that a black president is around the corner. And it has been atmospheric like introducing the next president of the United States, Senator Barack Obama. The name is all over the place and one can tell a second generation immigrant has shown that it is possible, and of course, “Yes we can.”

So when I bumped into black fellas from all walks of life at this historic place known for its thriving businesses relating to African cultural heritage – Papa’s West, African Treasures, Kumasi Gift Shop, World Stage Performance Gallery, African Heritage & Antique Collection, Hisam’s African & Urban Wear, Eso Won Book Store, Zambezi, Ackee Bamboo Restaurant, Lucy Florence Cultural Center, 5th Street Dick’s Coffeehouse, Leimert Park Eye Wear, etc. – I had the ultimate feel that Obama has arrived and it’s about time for the white folks to show some respect after hundreds of years of slavery, the separate but equal Jim Crow ballast and the Civil Rights Movement from around which blacks went through hell in America.

Of course, Obama is the “man of the hour,” never mind the “hood rats,” though their point remains very relevant because it is perceived to be the “same old song,” over and over again, which is typical of political campaigns. But Obama has changed a whole lot and we are beginning to see a difference since the history of political campaigns in an America that survived slave labor, segregation, Civil War, free speech, annexation and international conflicts.

I have not digged into Obama and all that campaign slogans with Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator John McCain until browsing Shelby Steel’s new book “A Bound Man: Why We Are Excited About Obama and Why He Can’t Win,” which is about an emerging black president, even with the debates and tabloid sensationalism as I have thought I should make a sketch and caricature that comes along with cocky politicians of our day, checking my mailbox during the course of my usual runs, was March 2008 edition of Ebony Magazine and guess what, Obama was on the cover with bold prints, “IN OUR LIFETIME: ARE WE REALLY WITNESSING THE ELECTION OF THE NATION’S FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?”

I read every bit of the story starting with “How Team Obama & Black America Are Making History,” a detailed campaign run covered by Sylvester Monroe, Kevin Chappell & Brian Monroe exclusively for Ebony Magazine. The tale – without tell-flaws -- was electric, Shakespearean, and amazing with an interesting opening act. 30-year-old Karen Richardson who studied law at Howard University had in 2005 interned at Senator Obama’s office in Washington D.C. She got hooked with “Obama fever” and abandoned every other project in her ensuing career committing herself to some great stuff when called upon to take the position of political director in Iowa State. That leadership role gave Obama Iowa without qualms. And so the story goes.

Richardson doesn’t have many words to explain her excitement when picked to run the show in Iowa. Well traveled and dedicated to change she said:

“When they asked me to stay on, I was sort of on a different course. But I looked at Barack and the way he interacted with his staff. I knew he was brilliant, and I looked at his character. There are a lot of smart people, but being on the Senate staff with him, you knew there was something special happening. All that combined to keep me there. It just felt right.”

What is more touching to me in the Obama for President Campaign is the drama at the barber shops. I did have to poke around and do some crazy stuff notably with the interest I have picked in this energetic and brilliant man who has survived all battle wounds growing up not knowing much about his father. Barber shops to me are like the comedy clubs where if you can’t control your emotions you will leave with cracked ribs.

My first point of call was a newly opened barber shop called Total Body Retreat Barber Shop on La Brea and Florence just around the corner from Inglewood’s bubbling Civic Center where everybody is talking about politics, the coming of age in the 21st Century and precisely “change” that would perhaps turn things around based on a new generation of voters. Obama’s sign graced every lawn in this barber shop and loquacious clients and youngish barbers had begun to engage in the kind of politics never seen before in a generation that is beginning to get the awareness of why “my vote should count in effecting change.” A new generation has popped up and like the saying goes, “politics make strange bedfellows.” The coinage should be rather “new age politics make good buddies” feeling how these kids are sticking together for change.

There was not much ado about the other barber shop – Magic Artistic Barber and Beauty Salon – down the street just by the Inglewood Car Wash on La Brea and Hardy. It was kind of mellow, lacking enthusiasm with old school flavored politics. Though politics was discussed but it had a nagging and who cares kind of flavor typical of the old guards the youngish entrepreneurs are clamoring for its change.

But the TV talk shows and radio commentators on both sides of the political spectrum – the left and the right, or perhaps the progressives and the neo-cons – doesn’t really matter in what has been going on at these barber shops as these young generations deals with reality, on a day-to-day basis, with all hopes being dashed by an outrageous administration. They have seen the downsizing, the ridiculous hike in gas prices, the increasingly crime waves in the neighborhoods, the slowing business activities as a result of the so-called “Bush Doctrine” which only benefits the rich, widening the gap between the haves and have-nots, and the whole concept that America is falling apart with every situation “not getting any better.” They have seen the “American Dream” slip away by hopelessness.

About a decade ago, not too many black folks were interested in voting to decide who the next president of the United States would be on the basis an election would not “change anything,” that the same old politicians and their sugar-coated mouth would continuously be the story, and that once these politicians are elected into office, the story changes and nothing gets done. But now, this new generation of “progressives,” from about a decade ago which seems to be diminishing the strength of the Baby Boomers are doing something different. They now belong to the political elite class. They have been raised humble from the past baby booming years, and they are beginning to realize American destiny should be in their own hands, thus the desperate need for a change of the guards. They want out of the old school kind of politics. And they mean it. And that is one of the reasons why they are now totally engaged in making sure change comes about with a new kind of leadership.

So, when one delves into the Obama campaign camp, it has increasingly become obvious that a new generation of political pragmatists have emerged sounding off on the continuous cliché of “change.” Nonetheless, the black vote is very relevant and just like Professor Ronald Walters of University of Maryland observed, “The Black vote is extremely important. The problem is that it is more powerful when it coalesces. It is weaker when it is divided. The name of the game is power not representation.”

Of course, “power” is the keyword and if Blacks should come out and vote en-masse for “change,” a derailed “Bush Doctrine” will be history in American politics just for the economical damage it has caused the American people.

For the last few months, anybody reading the newspapers and journals or watching talk or political TV shows could only conclude that the way of American politics has changed and Obamanian quest for change is spreading across America. It has been very interesting! It has been interesting, indeed!! And we hope it gets more interesting as the conventions draws nearer.

And with Obama defeating Clinton in the Vermont primaries some hours ago as I wrap up this piece, Ohio, Texas and Rhode Island is now up for grabs to probably determine the party's presidential nominee. Whatever happens and who ever gets the ticket, we hope they will practice what they have preached all along, that is, in the event any of the democratic nominee wins the presidency.

For Obama, "yes, we can!"

"So, yo, go out there and vote, dawg!!!"

KNOCK, KNOCK

By issuing subpoenas to five Times journalists, the Trump administration reveals its first response to unwanted national security coverage: ...